The relationship between actual risk exposure and risk appetite is best illustrated by "Residual risk that exceeds appetite." Residual risk is the risk that remains after risk mitigation measures (controls) have been implemented. If the residual risk exceeds the organization's risk appetite (the level of risk it is willing to accept), it means that the organization is exposed to more risk than it finds acceptable.
Option A describes a situation where the remaining risk (residual risk) is beyond what the organization is willing to tolerate (exceeds appetite), making it the best illustration of the relationship between actual risk exposure and risk appetite. It highlights a potential misalignment between the implemented controls and the organization's risk tolerance.
A seems the best option:
If the residual risk exceeds the organization's risk appetite, it means that the organization is exposed to more risk than it is willing to accept, which may result in negative consequences such as financial losses, reputational damage, or regulatory sanctions.
Therefore, monitoring and managing residual risk levels in relation to risk appetite is a critical aspect of effective risk management, as it helps ensure that the organization is aware of its risk exposure and takes appropriate actions to align its risk-taking activities with its strategic objectives and risk tolerance levels.
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Rooks
Highly Voted 3 years, 4 months agoSuperMax
Most Recent 1 month, 1 week agoCbtL
9 months agoKoulyo
9 months, 1 week agojohn_boogieman
10 months, 3 weeks agoMartyMar
1 year, 2 months agoCeecil1959
1 year, 9 months agoRaj1510
1 year, 11 months agoMusMus
2 years agoNeilKK
3 years, 5 months agoAnon530
2 years, 9 months ago