Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.
exam questions

Exam CISA All Questions

View all questions & answers for the CISA exam

Exam CISA topic 1 question 540 discussion

Actual exam question from Isaca's CISA
Question #: 540
Topic #: 1
[All CISA Questions]

Which of the following would lead an IS auditor to conclude that the evidence collected during a digital forensic investigation would not be admissible in court?

  • A. The logs failed to identify the person handling the evidence.
  • B. The person who collected the evidence is not qualified to represent the case.
  • C. The evidence was not fully backed up using a cloud-based solution prior to the trial.
  • D. The evidence was collected by the internal forensics team.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?) , you can switch to a simple comment.
Switch to a voting comment New
PurpleParrot
3 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: A
The qualifications of the individual collecting the evidence do not necessarily affect the admissibility of the evidence itself. The focus is more on the chain of custody and proper handling procedures.
upvoted 2 times
...
Swallows
5 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: B
Option B: "The person who collected the evidence is not qualified to represent the case" would likely lead an IS auditor to conclude that the evidence collected during a digital forensic investigation would not be admissible in court. In legal proceedings, the qualifications and expertise of the individual collecting the evidence are essential factors for determining the admissibility of the evidence. If the person collecting the evidence lacks the necessary qualifications, such as proper training or certification in digital forensics, it could undermine the credibility and reliability of the evidence. Option C ("The evidence was not fully backed up using a cloud-based solution prior to the trial") also raises concerns about the integrity and preservation of the evidence, which could impact its admissibility. However, the qualifications of the individual collecting the evidence are typically more directly relevant to its admissibility in court.
upvoted 1 times
...
Changwha
1 year, 4 months ago
B. The person who collected the evidence is not qualified to represent the case.
upvoted 2 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...