An organization considers implementing a system that uses a technology that is not in line with the organization's IT strategy. Which of the following is the BEST justification for deviating from the IT strategy?
A.
The system makes use of state-of-the-art technology.
B.
The system has a reduced cost of ownership.
C.
The organization has staff familiar with the technology.
D.
The business benefits are achieved even with extra costs.
D. The business benefits are clearly demonstrably superior, and the deviation is temporary and has a well-defined migration plan to align with the IT strategy in the long run.
I mean if business benefits are achieved with extra costs.. one could argue that the technology implemented is technically in-line with the IT strategy..? I wish someone could clarify this one.
None of the options provided are the BEST justification for deviating from the IT strategy. Deviating from the IT strategy should only be done after careful consideration of the potential risks, costs, and benefits. The decision should be based on a sound business case that outlines the potential benefits, costs, and risks of implementing the new technology.
upvoted 3 times
...
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
PurpleParrot
3 months agoSwallows
7 months, 1 week agoKAP2HURUF
8 months, 3 weeks agostarzuu
1 year, 4 months ago3008
1 year, 6 months ago3008
1 year, 5 months ago007Georgeo
1 year, 6 months ago