Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.
exam questions

Exam CISA All Questions

View all questions & answers for the CISA exam

Exam CISA topic 1 question 122 discussion

Actual exam question from Isaca's CISA
Question #: 122
Topic #: 1
[All CISA Questions]

External experts were used on a recent IT audit engagement. While assessing the external experts' work, the internal audit team found some gaps in the evidence that may have impacted their conclusions. What is the internal audit team's BEST course of action?

  • A. Engage another expert to conduct the same testing.
  • B. Report a scope limitation in their conclusions.
  • C. Recommend the external experts conduct additional testing.
  • D. Escalate to senior management.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?) , you can switch to a simple comment.
Switch to a voting comment New
SBD600
Highly Voted 1 year, 6 months ago
Selected Answer: C
The best course of action for the internal audit team is to recommend that the external experts conduct additional testing. This allows the external experts to address the gaps in evidence and ensure their conclusions are accurate and complete.
upvoted 5 times
...
PurpleParrot
Most Recent 1 month, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
Option B emphasizes transparency, which is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the audit process. By reporting a scope limitation, the internal audit team ensures that stakeholders are aware of any uncertainties or deficiencies in the evidence provided by external experts. This aligns with professional standards and ethical practices in auditing, reinforcing the credibility of their conclusions and fostering trust in the audit process. Prioritizing transparency is essential for effective risk management and informed decision-making
upvoted 2 times
...
46080f2
5 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: C
In this scenario, the internal audit team's best course of action would be to thoroughly document the gaps in evidence that may have impacted the external experts' conclusions. They should communicate these gaps transparently to the external experts, providing additional context and information to help them understand the limitations of the evidence. By being transparent and collaborative, the internal audit team can work together with the external experts to address any discrepancies and ensure a more accurate and comprehensive audit report. Therefore, I vote for C. Recommend the external experts conduct additional testing.
upvoted 1 times
Bosstate26
3 months, 4 weeks ago
Do the internal Auditors have the authority to pass recommendations to the External Expects, or they recommend management to then talk to external experts?
upvoted 1 times
...
...
a84n
6 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
Answer: B Transparency, Risk Communication, Accountability
upvoted 1 times
...
Tef_corp
7 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: B
When assessing the work of external experts during an IT audit engagement, the BEST course of action for the internal audit team is to report a scope limitation in their conclusions. This ensures transparency and highlights any gaps or limitations in the evidence provided by the external experts
upvoted 1 times
...
Swallows
7 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: C
If the evaluation by outside experts is inadequate, then it is correct to recommend that additional testing be conducted.
upvoted 1 times
...
fori12
7 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
B and D look valid . i will go with B as we need to document and report
upvoted 1 times
...
mibg83
1 year, 5 months ago
Selected Answer: B
is the appropriate action because it transparently communicates the identified gaps in the evidence to stakeholders. By reporting the limitations, the internal audit team ensures that the stakeholders are aware of the potential impact on the reliability and completeness of the audit findings and conclusions.
upvoted 4 times
...
3008
1 year, 5 months ago
Selected Answer: B
the BEST course of action for the internal audit team would be to report a scope limitation in their conclusions. This means that the internal audit team should document the issues they have identified and clearly communicate to stakeholders the limitations of the audit findings.
upvoted 2 times
3008
1 year, 5 months ago
recommending the external experts conduct additional testing, may be appropriate in some cases. However, it would only be appropriate if the gaps in evidence are specific and limited in scope. If the gaps are more widespread, then this option may not be effective.
upvoted 3 times
...
...
007Georgeo
1 year, 6 months ago
Selected Answer: C
C. Recommend the external experts conduct additional testing
upvoted 2 times
...
saado9
1 year, 7 months ago
B. Report a scope limitation in their conclusions.
upvoted 2 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...