Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.
exam questions

Exam CBAP All Questions

View all questions & answers for the CBAP exam

Exam CBAP topic 1 question 104 discussion

Actual exam question from IIBA's CBAP
Question #: 104
Topic #: 1
[All CBAP Questions]

Mark is the business analyst for his organization. He is working with the solution development team and he believes that the team does not want to implement a certain portion of the requirements. The team is expressing the difficulty of the requirements and how it will be extremely challenging to complete. When Mark asks about a similar project that the team completed, they insist that this is a different type of requirements though Mark believes that it is not.
What is the solution development team appearing to do to the requirements?

  • A. Change the prioritization of the requirements based on the past project.
  • B. Change the prioritization of the requirements based on overstated complexity of the project work.
  • C. Get the requirements removed from the project scope.
  • D. Have the business analyst report the difficulty of the project work to the project customer.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?) , you can switch to a simple comment.
Switch to a voting comment New
CBAPCohort6
1 month, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: B
B. Change the prioritization of the requirements based on overstated complexity of the project work. In this scenario, the solution development team appears to be emphasizing the difficulty and complexity of the current requirements, which may be a way to change the prioritization of those requirements based on their perceived challenges​.
upvoted 1 times
...
basmus12
1 month, 2 weeks ago
The correct answer is B. In this scenario, the development team is likely exaggerating the complexity of the requirements in an attempt to influence the prioritization. By overstating the difficulty, the team may aim to deprioritize or delay working on those requirements, possibly to avoid or reduce the effort involved. This tactic could result in changes to how the requirements are handled, even if the actual complexity is manageable, as Mark suspects. Option C (getting the requirements removed) could be a potential long-term goal, but in this context, the immediate action seems to be altering the prioritization rather than outright removal.
upvoted 2 times
basmus12
1 month, 2 weeks ago
Also, they said it complex and challenging, but they didn't mention it's not feasible.
upvoted 2 times
...
...
BA1002
3 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: C
For me it s C option because the dev team express that it is complex to implement and they didn't mention that it will be better to postpone the implementation to another time
upvoted 1 times
...
Wlkkkk
2 years ago
I would go with C. 2nd sentence said that team doesn't want to implement the requirements.
upvoted 4 times
...
MFZZ
2 years, 9 months ago
Prioritisation of requirements is used to minimise risk during development so that the most important or high risk requirements are implemented first
upvoted 2 times
...
SamiAbuQurs
2 years, 10 months ago
Can any one explain why B not C?
upvoted 3 times
Alwaysmoses
2 years, 5 months ago
implementation team is not asking to remove it it is only asking for re-prioritization due to complexity
upvoted 2 times
...
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...