Exam CBAP topic 1 question 434 discussion

review and workshop

• Reviews: used to confirm a set of elicitation results. Such reviews could be informal or formal depending on the risks of not having correct, useful, and relevant information. • Workshops: used to conduct reviews of the drafted elicitation results using any level of formality. A predetermined agenda, scripts, or scenario tests may be used to walk through the elicitation results, and feedback is requested from the participants and recorded.

"Reviews and workshops provide opportunities for stakeholders to collaborate, discuss, and clarify requirements in a structured environment. While item tracking and mind mapping can be useful techniques in organizing and visualizing requirements, they may not directly address the issue of conflicting requirements User stories and scope modeling are valuable techniques for capturing and defining requirements in an Agile environment. However, they may not inherently prevent conflicting requirements from arising. These methods primarily focus on defining the scope and user needs but may not directly address conflicts that arise from differing stakeholder perspectives or priorities. Brainstorming and estimation are creative techniques used to generate ideas and estimate effort, but they may not specifically address conflicting requirements."

Under approve requirements task, could be A but mind mapping is not a stated technique for approve requirements hence correct Ans is C

Review, workshop and interviews are all elicitations techniques Answer C

C=Reviews and workshops

Ans C 4.3.6

pg97 Ans C

Ans -c. review and collaboration