A company seeking to hire engineers in Silicon Valley ran an ad campaign targeting women in a specific age range who live in the San Francisco Bay Area. Which Calo objective privacy harm is likely to result from this campaign?
The most likely privacy harm resulting from the ad campaign targeting women in a specific age range who live in the San Francisco Bay Area is:
A. Lost opportunity.
Lost opportunity occurs when individuals are excluded or overlooked for opportunities based on their demographic characteristics, such as age, gender, or location. In this case, targeting a specific demographic for hiring ads could inadvertently exclude qualified candidates who do not fit the targeted criteria, resulting in a loss of opportunities for those individuals.
"The objective category of privacy harm is the unanticipated or coerced use of information concerning a person against that person. These are negative, external actions justified by reference to personal information." The definition seems to turn on the idea of unanticipated or coerced use of information against the person. In that light, it could only be social detriment, because the only data subjects are the female programmers. It is not a good answer, by the way. A - Lost opportunity is not applicable to women applying for a job - although it could apply to men who want that job. But in Calo's privacy harm formulation, it is the use of personal data against the person who is providing it, not others in the population.
upvoted 1 times
...
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Ahpl
Highly Voted 2 years, 8 months agoSsourav
Most Recent 3 months, 2 weeks agoofirga
9 months, 1 week agoChaChaMcGraw
2 years, 6 months ago