Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.
exam questions

Exam CIPT All Questions

View all questions & answers for the CIPT exam

Exam CIPT topic 1 question 21 discussion

Actual exam question from IAPP's CIPT
Question #: 21
Topic #: 1
[All CIPT Questions]

Which is NOT a suitable method for assuring the quality of data collected by a third-party company?

  • A. Verifying the accuracy of the data by contacting users.
  • B. Validating the company's data collection procedures.
  • C. Introducing erroneous data to see if its detected.
  • D. Tracking changes to data through auditing.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?) , you can switch to a simple comment.
Switch to a voting comment New
Ssourav
3 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: C
The correct answer is C. Introducing erroneous data to see if it's detected. This method is not suitable for assuring the quality of data collected by a third-party company because it involves intentionally introducing false data, which could create confusion, legal issues, or harm the integrity of the data set. The other methods—verifying accuracy, validating procedures, and tracking changes through auditing—are all legitimate ways to ensure data quality.
upvoted 1 times
...
ofirga
9 months, 2 weeks ago
The answer is C. The method that is NOT suitable for assuring the quality of data collected by a third-party company is C. Introducing erroneous data to see if it’s detected. While it might seem like a way to test the system, intentionally introducing incorrect data can lead to unintended consequences and potentially harm the accuracy and reliability of the collected information. Instead, focus on other methods like verifying accuracy, validating procedures, and tracking changes through auditing to ensure data quality.
upvoted 1 times
...
rajiabdmjd
1 year, 7 months ago
Selected Answer: C
C. Introducing erroneous data to see if it's detected. Introducing erroneous data to see if it's detected is not a suitable method for assuring the quality of data collected by a third-party company. This approach is likely to introduce additional errors into the data and may not provide a reliable measure of the quality of the data. Suitable methods for assuring the quality of data collected by a third-party company include verifying the accuracy of the data by contacting users, validating the company's data collection procedures, and tracking changes to data through auditing. These methods can help to ensure that the data collected is accurate, complete, and reliable, which is important for making informed decisions based on that data.
upvoted 2 times
...
z80r
1 year, 10 months ago
Selected Answer: C
C guys
upvoted 2 times
...
Sara_sw
2 years ago
Selected Answer: C
The question asks which is NOT the correct approach. A is correct, C is NOT correct so the answer is C
upvoted 3 times
...
Sbowo
2 years, 11 months ago
C is NOT correct, see page 63 book Privacy in Technology by Cannon
upvoted 2 times
...
k4d4v4r
3 years ago
A is correct then
upvoted 2 times
...
k4d4v4r
3 years ago
A is absurd and would be a privacy violation
upvoted 1 times
...
837vq3
3 years, 1 month ago
Why not "B" " Introducing erroneous data to see if its detected."?
upvoted 2 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...