TWO EXCEPTIONS to the prohibition on interception often apply in the workplace. Under federal law, interception is permitted:
1. If a person is a party to a call or where one of the parties has given consent
2. The interception is done in the ordinary course of business
An employer who provides communication services, such as a company telephone or email service, has the ability to intercept provided the interception occurs in the normal course of the user’s business. An important distinction exists when an employer listens to an employee’s purely personal call.
In this instance, the employer risks violation of the wiretap laws. As courts have split on how broadly to define the “ordinary course of business,” many employers rely on the consent exception for interception of telephone calls.
Privacy professionals should be alert to the requirements of relevant state laws on recording phone calls, because some of these laws require ONE-PARTY CONSENT, while others mandate that ALL PARTIES TO THE CALL CONSENT.
upvoted 1 times
...
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Bhimesh
7 months, 2 weeks ago