B. Appoint a new Privacy Officer (PO) for that jurisdiction.
While it may be beneficial in some cases to have a designated Privacy Officer for a specific jurisdiction, it's not a mandatory step for every expansion. The need for a separate PO would depend on the size of the operations, the complexity of the regulatory landscape in that jurisdiction, and the overall structure of the organization. The other options are foundational steps when expanding into a new jurisdiction.
I suggest B, it is not always required to hire a DPO whenever you start in a new jurisdiction
upvoted 3 times
...
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
carlosbui
1 year agoSsourav
1 year, 2 months ago[Removed]
1 year, 2 months agoemily0922
1 year, 3 months ago