Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.
exam questions

Exam CIPM All Questions

View all questions & answers for the CIPM exam

Exam CIPM topic 1 question 69 discussion

Actual exam question from IAPP's CIPM
Question #: 69
Topic #: 1
[All CIPM Questions]

SCENARIO -
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Perhaps Jack Kelly should have stayed in the U.S. He enjoys a formidable reputation inside the company, Special Handling Shipping, for his work in reforming certain "rogue" offices. Last year, news broke that a police sting operation had revealed a drug ring operating in the Providence, Rhode Island office in the United States. Video from the office's video surveillance cameras leaked to news operations showed a drug exchange between Special Handling staff and undercover officers.
In the wake of this incident, Kelly had been sent to Providence to change the "hands off" culture that upper management believed had let the criminal elements conduct their illicit transactions. After a few weeks under Kelly's direction, the office became a model of efficiency and customer service. Kelly monitored his workers' activities using the same cameras that had recorded the illegal conduct of their former co-workers.
Now Kelly has been charged with turning around the office in Cork, Ireland, another trouble spot. The company has received numerous reports of the staff leaving the office unattended. When Kelly arrived, he found that even when present, the staff often spent their days socializing or conducting personal business on their mobile phones. Again, he observed their behaviors using surveillance cameras. He issued written reprimands to six staff members based on the first day of video alone.
Much to Kelly's surprise and chagrin, he and the company are now under investigation by the Data Protection Commissioner of Ireland for allegedly violating the privacy rights of employees. Kelly was told that the company's license for the cameras listed facility security as their main use, but he does not know why this matters. He has pointed out to his superiors that the company's training programs on privacy protection and data collection mention nothing about surveillance video.
You are a privacy protection consultant, hired by the company to assess this incident, report on the legal and compliance issues, and recommend next steps.
What should you advise this company regarding the status of security cameras at their offices in the United States?

  • A. Add security cameras at facilities that are now without them.
  • B. Set policies about the purpose and use of the security cameras.
  • C. Reduce the number of security cameras located inside the building.
  • D. Restrict access to surveillance video taken by the security cameras and destroy the recordings after a designated period of time.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
katizeti
10 months ago
B should be correct
upvoted 1 times
...
Cock
1 year ago
Selected Answer: B
In US is B. Set policies about the purpose and use of the security cameras. It's crucial to establish clear guidelines and policies regarding the use of security cameras to ensure they are used for legitimate security purposes and comply with privacy regulations.
upvoted 2 times
...
tonik
1 year, 5 months ago
Selected Answer: D
...in EU is D
upvoted 1 times
DPRamone
8 months, 3 weeks ago
The question explicitely states the offices in the US.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...