From ACSP Learning book QoS Egress Queue Shaping/Rate Limiting:
- A is wrong because "EQS limits the amount of traffic transmitted per output queue"
- B is wrong because Interface Rate Limiting can be applied for broadcast, multicast and unknown unicast and Interface Rate Limiting is not same than EQS
- C is wrong because "EQS can be configured on an Ethernet port or on link aggregation group (LAC)"
- D is correct
https://www.arubanetworks.com/techdocs/AOS-CX/10.08/PDF/qos_832x.pdf
Page 851 Study Guide:
Egress queue shaping allows you to apply a maximum bandwidth to a priority queue, as well as a burst size.
[Aruba Networks]
I think it should be D. EQS can be configured with a schedule profile and be applied on an ETH port or LAG, cannot be applied in globally (Test with 8400 and 8325).
I think that C is correct because rate limiting can be applied globally by a policy and for egress queue shapping apply the global schedule profile when apply the queue profile.
Based on the schedule profile, DWRR is being used and the queue and schedule profile are applied globally.
A is not correct: queue shaping restrict outbound traffic
B is not correct: restrict unknow unicast
D is not correct: traffic rate limit is configured on interface level
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.HPE6-A73 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
johnhenri
6 months, 3 weeks agoA10busted
1 year agoSeidorBruno
1 year, 3 months agoQiQi
1 year, 6 months agoAlialo
1 year, 11 months agoMrBB
1 year, 11 months agomanrodman
1 year, 12 months agoslotblocker
1 year, 4 months agoomen
2 years, 1 month ago