An organization has servers running mission-critical workloads on-premises around the world. They want to modernize their infrastructure with a multi-cloud architecture. What benefit could the organization experience?
A.
Ability to disable regional network connectivity during cyber attacks
B.
Ability to keep backups of their data on-premises in case of failure
C.
Full management access to their regional infrastructure
D.
Reduced likelihood of system failure during high demand events
The answer is D: Reduced likelihood of system failure during high demand events.
A multi-cloud architecture can help organizations to reduce the likelihood of system failure during high demand events by spreading their workloads across multiple clouds. This can help to ensure that even if one cloud experiences an outage, the organization's applications will still be available to users.
The correct answer is D. Reduced likelihood of system failure during high demand events because a multi-cloud architecture allows organizations to distribute workloads across multiple cloud providers and regions, ensuring high availability, redundancy, and scalability during traffic spikes.
Why Not the Other Options?
A. Ability to disable regional network connectivity during cyber attacks – Disabling regional connectivity is not a core benefit of multi-cloud. Instead, multi-cloud improves resilience by distributing workloads.
B. Ability to keep backups of their data on-premises in case of failure – While data backups are important, multi-cloud focuses on workload distribution across multiple providers, not just on-premises backups.
C. Full management access to their regional infrastructure – Multi-cloud spans multiple cloud providers, which may result in some management complexity, rather than full unified control.
I do not see C as the right answer because this is a benefit that the organization already has. The question ask what are the benefits of partnering with a public cloud provider so it should be D.
As the are servers running in mission-critical workloads, so most advantageous organization benefit would be reduced system failure during high demand and peak.
The ability to reduce the likelihood of system failure during high demand events is a benefit of a multi-cloud architecture for mission-critical workloads.
With a multi-cloud architecture, the organization can distribute their workload across multiple cloud providers. This means that if one cloud provider is experiencing high demand or an outage, the other cloud providers can continue to serve the workload. This reduces the likelihood of system failure and ensures that the organization's mission-critical workloads are always available.
Answer should be D - By adopting a multi-cloud architecture, the organization can distribute its workload across multiple cloud providers and regions, which can help reduce the risk of system failure during high demand events. Can the admin team please change the correct answer? thanks
Option C, "Full management access to their regional infrastructure," might be important in a multi-cloud architecture, but in the context of the given scenario, the organization is specifically looking to modernize their infrastructure with a multi-cloud approach.
Option D, "Reduced likelihood of system failure during high demand events," is a significant benefit of a multi-cloud architecture. By distributing workloads across multiple cloud providers, the organization can better handle spikes in demand and reduce the risk of system failures.
While option C is relevant for management access, it doesn't directly address the benefits of a multi-cloud approach in terms of modernizing and improving infrastructure resilience. So, in this scenario, option D seems to be the more directly applicable benefit.
By distributing workloads across multiple cloud providers, the organization can enhance performance and availability. They can leverage different cloud providers' data centers in various regions to bring the workloads closer to end-users, reducing latency and improving responsiveness. Additionally, if one cloud provider experiences an outage or performance issues, the organization can redirect traffic and maintain operations using alternative cloud providers.
A multi-cloud architecture can improve disaster recovery and business continuity capabilities. By spreading workloads across different cloud providers and geographic regions, the organization can implement geo-redundancy and ensure data replication and failover mechanisms in case of disruptions or disasters. This helps mitigate the risk of a single point of failure and provides resiliency for critical workloads.
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
hireshgupta
Highly Voted 1 year agoddeveloperr
Most Recent 3 days, 23 hours ago76ffe88
3 months, 3 weeks agoaUMMDqZmjLBx
4 months, 3 weeks agoRiise
7 months agoazezdev
7 months, 3 weeks agoJJSENRIQUE
8 months, 4 weeks agochai_gpt
9 months ago__rajan__
9 months, 2 weeks agokatyk
10 months agoGagan12345
10 months agomdsarfraz69
10 months, 2 weeks agoafeff
10 months, 2 weeks agoAnuj_Agrawal
1 year, 1 month agoAnuj_Agrawal
1 year, 1 month agocookieMr
1 year, 1 month ago[Removed]
1 year, 4 months ago