Exam Professional Cloud Architect topic 1 question 131 discussion

Answer should be D, https://cloud.google.com/load-balancing/docs/https/setting-up-https-serverless#gcloud:-cloud-functions https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/networking/better-load-balancing-for-app-engine-cloud-run-and-functions

IMHO it is d), not b). Reason is that you don't need Cloud Spanner just to store user data - FireStore is the better solution. Additionally, I see no indications concerning the requirement to use GKE... Please correct me when I am wrong.

As per ChatGPT , answer is C

xcvxcv

Answer is D. Solution should be cost effective and highly reliable. Cloud storage and firestore is suitable .

absolutely D because kubernetes is not cost effective. cloud functions are a better shot

CDN is for caching. For static website hosting a storage bucket is a good choice, thus A and C are eliminated. B, Cloud Spanner, my nightmare. I accidentally created an empty cloud spanner and it burned like 30-40 USD per day! I got a huge amount of billing from GCP that month! No way to be cost-effective. D, Cloud Functions are good for simple API services and have no cost if not in use. SQL or NoSQL for user data is not a strong factor here, either should be fine.

The correct answer with the lowest cost is D

in B) it says zonal GKE with worker nodes in multiple zones how zonal and in multiple zones?! And that 100% eliminate B

Actually it is B. Highly reliable, using Load Balancer, Spikes and several API. D is less reliable, as functions will take long to cold start and will have a time out and not using LB. The only draw back is cost.

User data in a relational database is not a good option, A B C are ruled out. Left with D - User data in Firestore.

D is the correct option since CDN is not for storage of html content, so you have only the option B and D. And the option B required that you have a containerezed application in other way, you can't use k8s. So the option is D.

D is the correct answer 1. Cloud CDN is not meant for storing contents. It can only cache but not act as the source-of-truth and moreover the question tells that the user traffic is less. Cloud CDN performs better when the user traffic is high 2. The spikes are very rare and the app gets low traffic most of the time. That said, putting a cluster is an expensive option. choosing a serverless supported app-platform (Cloud Run) and serverless supported DB (Firestore) makes perfect choice here to handle cost during low traffic and also handle any incoming sudden spikes

Cloud Spanner is expensive, so it cannot be that option.

Correct Answer Is D

Store static content such as HTML and images in a Cloud Storage bucket. Use Cloud Functions to host the APIs and save the user data in Firestore

The user of Spanner is mad (way to expensive for the requirement). CDN is not a storage solution. I suspect the charging model of firestore is also better for this application, not to mention document databases typically preferred for storing user data.