The reason i think it's A is because the excessive bandwidth filter contains facetime and is referenced by the application sensor with the action to block.
There is no reference to a bandwidth threshold at which point the filter is applied so the number of calls is irrelevant.
A, BEcause matching the override, and contains FACETIME
study guide security page 445 order of scan and blocking behavior:
1 application overrides in this case, blocking
Are we sure the answer is A? my doubt is if an app can be considered excessive bandwith even if it makes low traffic. In this case is doing low traffic. In fortinet lesson is not clear this concept. IF it is the case, correct answer should be B. Can someone help me to clarify this doubt?
Cause it is not based on how many calls you make, then you are categorized.
it is that facetime is categorized as a excessive app, and it is blocked, regarding of its behavior.
just like blocking youtube or a bad sites, cause they consume so few bandwidth or displaying only few bad content
It is A
The volume here is not the question. Excessive bandwidth filter will kick in first in the order of overrides and it's set to block.
All of vendors that I know uses first match rule, so when rule matches conditions that one will be used. And this is application filter, it doesn't count traffic.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
...
...
...
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
DriftandLuna
Highly Voted 2 years agoBUZOMD
Most Recent 2 years agoMturco
2 years agoMturco
2 years agoMturco
2 years, 1 month agoPakitorino
2 years agoPoBratsky
2 years, 2 months agoAngraMainyu
2 years, 6 months agoMturco
2 years agowwwwaaaa
1 year, 4 months agoCaptainPirate
1 year, 3 months agoBungee75
9 months, 2 weeks ago