Answer looks to be D. Although C looks compelling, port numbers don't show up in the collapsed section in interface pairing view like it is shown here. But it does show up like this in the sequence grouping view.
C. The firewall policies are listed by ingress and egress interfaces pairing view = NOK
This can be correct if we have on destination by rule
When we have 2 destination interface the view is by group sequence / sequence
Refer to NSE4 study guide | Policy List - Interface Pair view and by Sequence
Correct Answer:
C. The firewall policies are listed by ingress and egress interfaces pairing view.
Explanation of Each Option:
A. The Implicit group can include more than one deny firewall policy.
Incorrect. The "Implicit Deny" rule is a default, single policy applied to any unmatched traffic. It cannot include multiple policies.
B. The firewall policies are listed by ID sequence view.
Incorrect. The policies are grouped by interface pairings, not sorted by ID numbers.
C. The firewall policies are listed by ingress and egress interfaces pairing view.
Correct. The policies are grouped based on the interface pairings, such as LAN to WAN and WAN to LAN.
D. LAN to WAN, WAN to LAN, and Implicit are sequence grouping view lists.
Incorrect. The view is based on interface pairings, not sequence groupings like "LAN to WAN" or "Implicit."
I would say it is D because when you configure more than one interface the interface per view option disappears and only leaves by sequence and in this case it is not by sequence either.
I'm not sure about the group view, but for sure can NOT be C because there are 2 interfaces as destiny in the policy ID 1, when that happen, interface pair view dissapear automatically
In Policy & Objects policy list pages, there are two policy views: Interface Pair View and By Sequence view. Interface Pair View displays the policies in the order that they are checked for matching traffic, grouped by the pairs of incoming and outgoing interfaces in collapsible sections. The Interface Pair View can be used when a policy is configured with multiple interfaces.
C is correct. The sections appear only when you choose interface pair view. When you select sequence, it doesn't group the rules/policies into sections instead they are displayed based on the policy ID.
Scrap my earlier comment and selection. D seems like a more appropriate answer, since with multiple interfaces selected in the policies you cant select interface pairing view.
For each view, more than one view appeared for Rule ID 1. For only one to appear, it must be in the Grouping view list.
I recommend replicating it in the laboratory.
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Knocks
Highly Voted 4 months agoBloodyMery
4 months agodoubleA_doubleA
Most Recent 6 days, 5 hours agoDineshkaarthik
3 weeks agoBilale
3 weeks, 1 day agoSingSingHK
3 weeks, 6 days agorigonet
1 month agohecjoseroag
1 month agoJohny_437
1 month, 1 week agosxcap
1 month, 1 week agoFHLPASSION
1 month, 2 weeks agoJRKhan
1 month, 4 weeks agoJRKhan
2 months agoJRKhan
1 month, 4 weeks agos4mu3l007
2 months, 2 weeks agomarcovinicius4
2 months, 2 weeks ago3101a6a
2 months, 3 weeks agoherlock_sholmes_2810
2 months, 4 weeks ago61604de
3 months ago