C is wrong because (a) to configure a network prefix to inject into the BGP table, you do this under "config network" not under "config neighbor-range" and (b) it is the wrong prefix anyway -- should be 10.1.0.0 255.255.255.0
yes, but the question does not ask what command injects LAN segment into the BGP table; it is asking what command to configure BGP neighbors that have a given range of next-hop IP addresses. Thus C is incorrect, but D is correct.
In this question neighbour-group is already defined, the set route-reflector-client enable must also be defined in peer-group so that spoke to spoke networks can talk
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
ccie8122
2 months, 2 weeks agopeterpanko
4 months agoccie8122
2 months, 2 weeks agoCyril_the_Squirl
6 months, 3 weeks agomecacig953
6 months, 2 weeks agocharruco
8 months, 3 weeks agoDaLoGo
9 months, 2 weeks agotruserud
10 months ago5deee77
10 months, 2 weeks agoArtbrut
10 months, 2 weeks agoMikeSco001
10 months, 3 weeks ago