C is wrong because (a) to configure a network prefix to inject into the BGP table, you do this under "config network" not under "config neighbor-range" and (b) it is the wrong prefix anyway -- should be 10.1.0.0 255.255.255.0
yes, but the question does not ask what command injects LAN segment into the BGP table; it is asking what command to configure BGP neighbors that have a given range of next-hop IP addresses. Thus C is incorrect, but D is correct.
In this question neighbour-group is already defined, the set route-reflector-client enable must also be defined in peer-group so that spoke to spoke networks can talk
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
ccie8122
5 months, 1 week agopeterpanko
6 months, 3 weeks agoccie8122
5 months, 1 week agoCyril_the_Squirl
9 months, 2 weeks agomecacig953
9 months, 1 week agocharruco
11 months, 1 week agoDaLoGo
1 year agotruserud
1 year ago5deee77
1 year, 1 month agoArtbrut
1 year, 1 month agoMikeSco001
1 year, 1 month ago