Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.
exam questions

Exam PR2P All Questions

View all questions & answers for the PR2P exam

Exam PR2P topic 2 question 18 discussion

Actual exam question from Exin's PR2P
Question #: 18
Topic #: 2
[All PR2P Questions]

Scenario -
A central government department, the Ministry of Food Hygiene (MFH), faces increasing pressure to cut costs, better manage suppliers' performance and reduce the confusion caused by inadequate internal controls, outdated standards and outdated technology. External consultants were employed to conduct a feasibility study to identify options to address the problems, and the likely costs and benefits. The following options were considered:
✑ Do nothing.
✑ Re-engineer selected business functions.
✑ Outsource selected business functions.
The feasibility study concluded that there was a case for outsourcing the MFH Information Technology Division and the Facilities Division (maintenance of buildings and grounds). The recommendations were:
✑ One service provider should be contracted to provide the services currently provided by the Information Technology Division and the Facilities Division.
✑ A 10-year service contract should be agreed with the selected service provider.
The feasibility study developed high-level designs of the current organization, processes, systems and operating models, plus an outline Business Case for the required project. The external consultants also made the following recommendations for the management of the project:
✑ Use PRINCE2.
Set up the project with 4 management stages:

Stage 1. Standard PRINCE2 initiation activities.
Stage 2. Create detailed designs (future organization, processes, systems and operating models) and the service level agreement between MFH and the future service provider.
Stage 3. Request and evaluate proposals, select service provider and agree contract.
Stage 4. Transfer equipment and staff, transfer responsibility for service provision and run trial period.

Initial estimates indicated that the project would cost
2.5m and take two years to complete. MFH senior management agreed that there was a case for outsourcing, and accepted the recommendations as a basis for the project. There is an expected saving of 20m over 10 years.
The Outsourcing project has completed the Starting up a Project process and is now in the initiation stage. Because of the strategic importance of the project, the
MFH Chief Executive Officer has taken the role of Executive. A PRINCE2-experienced Project Manager has been appointed from within MFH. Staff within the business functions being outsourced will work with the external consultants who conducted the feasibility study to define the detailed designs.
Which 2 statements should be recorded under the Expected dis-benefits heading?

  • A. An investment of 2.5m is required.
  • B. Staff morale will be negatively affected.
  • C. The project will take two years to deliver.
  • D. Staff may lose the opportunity to work in Information Technology.
  • E. MFH will lose direct control over the outsourced business functions.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: CE 🗳️
Reference: http://www.whatisprince2.net/prince2-theme-business-case.php

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?) , you can switch to a simple comment.
Switch to a voting comment New
Assima
3 years, 4 months ago
C is the timescale of the project. So it should not be considered as dis-benefit for the project.
upvoted 1 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...