Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.
exam questions

Exam 312-49v10 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the 312-49v10 exam

Exam 312-49v10 topic 1 question 783 discussion

Actual exam question from ECCouncil's 312-49v10
Question #: 783
Topic #: 1
[All 312-49v10 Questions]

A large corporation hired an independent marketing firm to manage its email advertising campaign. Subsequently, it was found that the firm was sending commercial emails without including necessary information about how to stop receiving emails in the future. In addition, they failed to honor the opt-out requests of the recipients within 10 business days. Under the CAN-SPAM Act, which of the following is true?

  • A. Both the corporation and the marketing firm could be held legally responsible for the violation
  • B. Only the corporation would be held legally responsible for the violation
  • C. The marketing firm alone would be held legally responsible for the violation
  • D. Neither the corporation nor the marketing firm would be held legally responsible for the violation
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Elb
6 months ago
Selected Answer: A
For example, in case of violation of law through emails sent for the promotion of commercial products and services, both the company whose product is being promoted in the message and the company that originally sent the message may be held legally responsible.
upvoted 1 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...