During an ongoing cybercrime investigation, a non-expert witness, who is an employee of the organization, testifies to observing unusual computer activity. Simultaneously, an expert witness introduces a record of the regularly conducted activity of the organization. The record was kept near the incident’s time adept as part of the regular activity. It reveals a similar observation as the non-expert witness. How would the Federal Rules of Evidence classify and treat these testimonies in this scenario?
Elb
7 months ago