Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.
exam questions

Exam 312-50v12 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the 312-50v12 exam

Exam 312-50v12 topic 1 question 164 discussion

Actual exam question from ECCouncil's 312-50v12
Question #: 164
Topic #: 1
[All 312-50v12 Questions]

You are the lead cybersecurity analyst at a multinational corporation that uses a hybrid encryption system to secure inter-departmental communications. The system uses RSA encryption for key exchange and AES for data encryption, taking advantage of the strengths of both asymmetric and symmetric encryption. Each RSA key pair has a size of 'n' bits, with larger keys providing more security at the cost of slower performance. The time complexity of generating an RSA key pair is O(n^2), and AES encryption has a time complexity of O(n). An attacker has developed a quantum algorithm with time complexity O((log n)^2) to crack RSA encryption. Given 'n=4000' and variable 'AES key size', which scenario is likely to provide the best balance of security and performance?

  • A. AES key size=128 bits: This configuration provides less security than option A, but RSA key generation and AES encryption will be faster.
  • B. AES key size=256 bits: This configuration provides a high level of security, but RSA key generation may be slow.
  • C. AES key size=192 bits: This configuration is a balance between options A and B, providing moderate security and performance.
  • D. AES key size=512 bits: This configuration provides the highest level of security but at a significant performance cost due to the large AES key size.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?) , you can switch to a simple comment.
Switch to a voting comment New
qtygbapjpesdayazko
8 months ago
Selected Answer: C
Keyword "best balance of security and performance" AES key size=192 bits, is the one with "balance" in the answer.
upvoted 1 times
...
Spam_Protection
8 months, 2 weeks ago
B. Only AES 256 is quantum resistant. AES-512 does not exist.
upvoted 2 times
...
calx5
9 months ago
Selected Answer: C
AES512, it seems it does not exist in an industrial.
upvoted 1 times
...
Unr34l
9 months, 1 week ago
Considering the goal of achieving a balance between security and performance, option B (AES key size=256 bits) is likely the most reasonable choice. It provides a high level of security while acknowledging that RSA key generation may be slower but is more practical than extremely large AES key sizes for general use.
upvoted 3 times
LeongCC
9 months ago
Agreed
upvoted 1 times
...
...
insaniunt
9 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: C
Considering the balance of security and performance, option C (AES key size=192 bits) seems to be a reasonable choice. It offers a compromise between the higher security of a 256-bit key and the faster performance of a 128-bit key, making it suitable for many practical scenarios.
upvoted 1 times
...
multivolt
9 months, 2 weeks ago
Could someone help me confirm the accuracy of this data
upvoted 1 times
...
qwerty100
9 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: C
I think it is C, but I am not sure C. AES key size=192 bits: This configuration is a balance between options A and B, providing moderate security and performance. (AES 512 does not exist) https://www.techtarget.com/searchsecurity/definition/Advanced-Encryption-Standard How AES encryption works: AES includes three block ciphers: AES-128 uses a 128-bit key length to encrypt and decrypt a block of messages. AES-192 uses a 192-bit key length to encrypt and decrypt a block of messages. AES-256 uses a 256-bit key length to encrypt and decrypt a block of messages. Each cipher encrypts and decrypts data in blocks of 128 bits using cryptographic keys of 128, 192 and 256 bits, respectively.
upvoted 2 times
qwerty100
9 months ago
It could be option B B. AES key size=256 bits: This configuration provides a high level of security, but RSA key generation may be slow. Quantum attacks: AES-256 is considered to be quantum resistant, as it has similar quantum resistance to AES-128's resistance against traditional, non-quantum, attacks at 128 bits of security. AES-192 and AES-128 are not considered quantum resistant due to their smaller key sizes. AES-192 has a strength of 96 bits against quantum attacks and AES-128 has 64 bits of strength against quantum attacks, making them both insecure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Encryption_Standard
upvoted 1 times
...
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...