Exam 312-49v10 topic 1 question 420 discussion

Here's a brief explanation of the other options: A. SWGDE & SWGIT: Organizations that provide guidelines and standards for digital evidence and forensic analysis, but not related to the admissibility of expert witnesses' testimony. B. IOCE: Not a recognized standard or precedent. C. Frye: A 1923 court case (Frye v. United States) that established a predecessor standard to Daubert, which has largely been replaced by the Daubert standard.

The correct answer is D. Daubert. The Daubert standard is a legal precedent set in 1993 by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals. It established guidelines for the admissibility of expert witnesses' testimony in federal legal proceedings, focusing on the reliability and relevance of the expert's testimony. The Daubert standard requires that expert testimony be: Based on sufficient facts or data The product of reliable principles and methods Relevant to the case at hand This standard has had a significant impact on the admission of expert testimony in federal courts and has been widely adopted in state courts as well.

D < https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/daubert_standard

509 U.S. 579 (1993) references Daubert (1993). It isn't in the EC Council book.

NOT on Computer Hacking Forensics Investigator (CHFI) Version 10 (Volumes 1 through 4)