Exam Certified Machine Learning Associate topic 1 question 7 discussion

E for sure. Some algorithms do not support or work less efficient with one-hot encoding.

One-hot encoding introduces a significant computational overhead, particularly when there are many categories in the feature variables. This is because it creates a new binary feature for each category, resulting in a high-dimensional representation. Such transformations are typically more efficient when performed on smaller, task-specific training datasets rather than on a global feature repository that serves multiple applications. Encoding in the feature repository also risks being rigid and unable to adapt to new categories, which further supports your argument.

. One-hot encoding is dependent on the target variable’s values which differ for each application. This one doesn't hold up because one-hot encoding isn't dependent on the target variable at all. It only represents categorical features and their individual categories as binary vectors. E. One-hot encoding is a potentially problematic categorical variable strategy for some machine learning algorithms. Certain algorithms, like tree-based models, are less sensitive to the one-hot encoding and might perform better with other encoding techniques. However, the primary issue often boils down to the high dimensionality that one-hot encoding can introduce, which can affect algorithms that don't handle sparse data well. So, you're still left with C as the best justification.

It might actually be E. According to these docs, this is the reason why the change was introduced was to allow algorithms that expect continuous features, such as logistic regression to use categorical features

Correct answer B