RSA DIGITAL SIGNATURES
A digital signature is used to prove the identity of the sender of a message and to show that a message has not been tampered with since the sender posted it. This
provides authentication, integrity, and non-repudiation. To create a digital signature using RSA encryption, the private key is used to encrypt the signature; the public key is distributed to allow others to read it.
I think answer is b.RSA.
Guys/Gals , RSA Is used for encryption not integrity , integrity = hashing = MD5 Encryption = Confidentiality
RSA is widely used for key exchange, encryption, and digital signatures
Hi WillGTechDaily,I think you should read the question again. The question asked about non-repudiation of data. Hashing and Encryption can't be used to achieve that . It's only digital signature .Hence ,the reason for RSA
Integrity = hashing, RSA is asymmetric algorithm
Experts discovered significant vulnerabilities in MD5 in 2004 and later years
Security experts now consider it cracked and discourage its use. However, it is still widely used to verify the integrity of files.
"DARRYL GIBSONs Book"
Hash values are also useful for verifying the INTEGRITY of data sent through insecure channels. So MD5 and SHA hash is ruled out. Non-repudiation = digital signatures, RSA provides that
Providing end-to-end file non-repudiation requires using a secure file transfer server that can perform file integrity checking, The cryptographically valid SHA1 and MD5 algorithms are widely used to do file integrity checking. SHA1 is the stronger of these, and is approved for file integrity checking
since SHA1 is not one of the option, the next best is MD5 - (C)
answer is RSA. As the answer can't be MD5, MD5 isn't as secure as SHA, if it was purely a hashing algorithm the chosen answer would have been SHA not MD5
Non-repudiation is the ability to prove that the file uploaded and the file downloaded are identical. The cryptographically valid SHA1 and MD5 algorithms are widely used to do file integrity checking. MD5 makes sense here.
Oh boy... This is definitely not Non-Repudiation. What you just defined is integrity, which SHA1 and MD5 are good for. But the questions doesn't ask about integrity. "Non-repudiation involves associating actions or changes with a unique individual."
should be B
RSA is the most widely used asymmetric algorithm: It provides a method to assure the confidentiality, integrity, authenticity, and non-repudiation of electronic communications and data storage.
If you read this, you will be lead to see C. MD5 is correct, since SHA (aka SHA-1) has been shunned from service?
Non-repudiation Techniques: For email transmission, non-repudiation typically involves using methods designed to ensure that a sender can’t deny having sent a particular message, or that a message recipient can’t deny having received it. Techniques would include email tracking. Cryptographic hash functions may be used to establish the integrity of transmitted documents. No encryption keys are involved, and strong hash functions are designed to be irreversible. Moreover, they’re designed to avoid collision, which occurs in the rare cases where two separate documents give rise to the same hash value.
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
jerryhungcc
Highly Voted 4 years, 4 months agoWillGTechDaily
Highly Voted 4 years, 4 months agoBisibaby
4 years, 3 months agoHeymannicerouter
3 years, 10 months agomlonz
Most Recent 3 years, 7 months agoKenCW
3 years, 8 months agofury247
3 years, 8 months agoDubbsnix
3 years, 10 months agodeb123
3 years, 10 months agoCryptomike87
3 years, 11 months agoAarongreene
3 years, 11 months agosimo77
3 years, 11 months agoHeymannicerouter
3 years, 10 months agoL1singh
3 years, 11 months agomatt9875
4 years ago[Removed]
3 years, 11 months agoHash___
3 years, 11 months agoHeymannicerouter
3 years, 10 months agoMatrix141
4 years agomcNik
4 years, 1 month agolsy
4 years, 2 months agowho__cares123456789___
4 years, 2 months agoHeymannicerouter
3 years, 10 months agoyalight
4 years, 2 months ago