A security engineer needs to quickly identify a signature from a known malicious file. Which of the following analysis methods would the security engineer most likely use?
A. Static analysis
Static analysis involves examining the file without executing it. This method is ideal for identifying known signatures, as it allows the security engineer to inspect the file's contents (such as its code, headers, or embedded metadata) for recognizable patterns or hash values that match known malicious signatures. Static analysis is quick because it doesn’t require running the file, and it can be done using antivirus software or specialized tools that compare file contents with a database of known threats.
Why the other options are less appropriate:
C. Network traffic analysis: Network traffic analysis focuses on monitoring network communication for suspicious activity. It is not suitable for identifying file signatures, as it deals with the behavior of files over the network rather than examining the file itself.
The correct answer is A. Static. Static analysis involves examining the code, binaries, or files without executing them. This method allows the security engineer to quickly identify known signatures of malicious files by analyzing their structure, patterns, and characteristics
upvoted 1 times
...
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Anyio
2 months ago9149f41
2 months, 3 weeks ago