Exam SY0-701 topic 1 question 468 discussion

When reviewing job postings, an analyst is most likely looking for information that could inadvertently expose the company's vulnerabilities or security posture. Posting software versions could reveal outdated or vulnerable systems, which attackers might exploit.

D is the better answer. Government identification numbers fall under sensitive data because some ID numbers can be misused as a launchpad for attacks. Software version numbers are typically public information. If a company is concerned about a vulnerability in a software version, it should be patched, upgraded, or replaced.

The Gov ID number usually never appears in the job ad. So this is not relevant with questions. However, the software version contains sensitive data.

Government Identification Numbers are more sensibile data than others.

An analyst reviewing job postings for sensitive company information would be most concerned about the disclosure of Government Identification Numbers. These numbers are highly sensitive and can be misused for identity theft and fraud. Here's why other options are less critical: A. Office addresses: While generally not considered highly confidential, publicly disclosing office addresses could potentially aid in physical security assessments or social engineering attacks. B. Software versions: Software versions are often publicly available and not considered highly sensitive. C. List of board members: While information about board members is generally public, disclosing this information in job postings might not be the company's standard practice. Therefore, the disclosure of Government Identification Numbers in job postings poses the highest risk of sensitive data leakage.