Correct Answer: D
255.255.255.240 provides 14 usable IP addresses, which is more than enough for the 6 usable IPs the customer needs.
This option is more efficient compared to 255.255.255.224, which provides 30 usable IPs and would waste a larger number of addresses.
255.255.255.240 = 11111111.1111111.1111111.11110000
Number of networks = 2^n; n = on bits (1); 2^4 = 16
Number of host = (2^n) - 2; n = off bits (0); (2^4) - 2 = 14
255.255.255.240 (Option D) is the most efficient choice, as it provides 14 usable addresses, which meets the requirement without wasting too many additional addresses.
The subnet mask 255.255.255.224 (option C) provides 6 usable IP addresses, which is exactly what the customer needs.
255.255.255.240 (option D) provides 14 usable IPs, which is more than needed.
So, C. 255.255.255.224 is the best answer for 6 usable IP addresses.
Wrong-Option C /27 provides 30 usable hosts. However, /29 provides exactly 6 usable host addresses, which is not an option here. Therefore option D is correct.
Since the customer needs 6 usable IP addresses, we should choose the smallest subnet that can accommodate this requirement while minimizing wasted addresses. 255.255.255.240 provides 14 usable addresses, which is the closest match to the requirement of 6 addresses.
upvoted 1 times
...
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
ba10f26
3 weeks, 3 days agoPowerserg28
1 month agoS1vu
2 months agoS1vu
2 months agoBobbyCruz111
2 months agoArmy_Germ
1 month, 3 weeks agoilikeyou
1 month, 3 weeks agochupapi_001
2 months, 2 weeks ago