Exam SY0-701 topic 1 question 259 discussion

NOT D. Block the URL shortener domain in the web proxy: Blocking the URL shortener domain in the web proxy is a good idea if you suspect that the malicious URLs lead to a harmful site, but in this case, the links are redirecting to a dead domain. The malicious domain itself is no longer active, so blocking the URL shortener might not address the immediate threat. Additionally, this step doesn't prevent other similar attacks with different shorteners or domains in the future.

D. Block the URL shortener domain in the web proxy: By blocking the URL shortener domain, the security team can prevent users from accessing potentially malicious links, even if the domain is currently dead. This proactive measure helps mitigate the risk of future attacks using the same URL shortener.

I go with B

Its D: The common element across all the emails is the URL shortener. By blocking the URL shortener domain in the web proxy, you immediately prevent users from accessing any link shortened by that service. This stops the attack at its source (as far as your organization is concerned) Not B: The dead domain is the destination of the attack, but the immediate problem is the URL shortener delivering users to that destination. Sinkholing the dead domain might be a good additional step, but it doesn't stop the initial click. The problem isn't the destination, it's the delivery mechanism (the URL shortener).

ok for those who fell for the trap. it didnt mention enterprise but its an enterprise based on the "security team". second for a business email, url shorteners are not needed. They are mainly used for marketing campaigns. So why not block them. Its D

The best step in this scenario is D. Block the URL shortener domain in the web proxy.

I go with B

Blocking the shortener domain prevents future access from those emails and similar ones.

NOT D. Block the URL shortener domain in the web proxy: Blocking the URL shortener domain in the web proxy is a good idea if you suspect that the malicious URLs lead to a harmful site, but in this case, the links are redirecting to a dead domain. The malicious domain itself is no longer active, so blocking the URL shortener might not address the immediate threat. Additionally, this step doesn't prevent other similar attacks with different shorteners or domains in the future.

The description reads like a threat actor is behind this. With nothing else to go off we need to assume this is the case. Therefor blocking the URL shortener will prevent the threat actor from redirecting the URL shortener to any other domains. If we choose option B, the threat actor could simply redirect the URL shortener to a different domain. Worse yet, a different domain that might actually be working.

D. Block the URL shortener domain in the web proxy. Explanation: Since the attack uses URL shorteners to redirect users to potentially malicious domains, the most effective mitigation is to block the URL shortener domain in the web proxy. This prevents employees from clicking on similar links in the future, even if the attacker changes the final redirect destination. Why not the other options? A. Create a blocklist for all subject lines – Not effective because attackers can easily modify subject lines to bypass filters. B. Send the dead domain to a DNS sinkhole – The domain is already dead, meaning it is no longer actively serving content. The threat lies in the URL shortener, which may redirect to different malicious sites in future attacks. C. Quarantine all emails received and notify all employees – While notifying employees is important, quarantining all emails may cause unnecessary disruptions. Blocking the URL shortener is a more effective preventive measure.

D. Block the URL shortener domain in the web proxy. Explanation: URL shorteners are often used in phishing attacks and malware distribution to obscure malicious links. Even though the current redirect domain is dead, attackers can update the shortener to point to a new malicious domain at any time. Blocking the URL shortener domain at the web proxy ensures that: Users cannot access any future malicious redirects coming from that shortener. The security team prevents future attacks using the same shortener service. It applies a broad and proactive security measure rather than reacting to just the current incident.

This provides immediate protection against current campaign

The issue involves a URL shortener that redirects to a dead domain. Blocking the URL shortener domain prevents any redirection attempts, regardless of the destination domain. This measure also addresses any future malicious redirections from the same shortener. Send the dead domain to a DNS sinkhole: While this may help if the dead domain becomes active again, it does not address the possibility of the URL shortener being used for other malicious redirections.

Jsmithy Response was on point look at his explanation

Even if the domain they redirect URLs to is currently dead, the URL could be reactivated in the future for malicious purposes.

B. GPT