Exam CAS-004 topic 1 question 489 discussion

 OVAL: This is a standardized language used to describe vulnerabilities and create custom detection rules, allowing the engineer to define the specific characteristics of the vulnerability within the internal software, even if a standard definition doesn't exist.  SCAP (Security Content Automation Protocol): While SCAP can be used to define vulnerabilities, it often relies on existing standard definitions, which is not ideal for a unique internal software vulnerability

Guys read the question carefully. Its says, vulnerability definition does not exist, the identification and remediation results should be tracked. OVAL alone would not provide tracking and remediation capabilities. SCAP is the best answer because it not only helps identify vulnerabilities but also integrates with vulnerability management systems.

The best option for identifying and tracking this vulnerability is D. OVAL (Open Vulnerability and Assessment Language). OVAL (Open Vulnerability and Assessment Language): OVAL is a standardized language used to describe the configuration and state of software and hardware vulnerabilities. It is specifically designed to be used for identifying vulnerabilities, even in cases where no predefined vulnerability definitions exist. OVAL allows security engineers to define custom checks to identify specific vulnerabilities in a system, making it ideal for identifying vulnerabilities in internally developed software. Furthermore, the results from OVAL can be integrated with vulnerability management systems for tracking remediation efforts.

If there is no Vulnerability definition SCAP will not make a finding. (False Negative) So the Security Administrator needs to use OVAL to write a custom definition. Then run SCAP.

Given the scenario of identifying vulnerabilities in internally developed software without a standard vulnerability definition, **OVAL (Open Vulnerability and Assessment Language)** would be the most applicable. OVAL allows for the creation of custom definitions and enables the engineer to specify the exact conditions that represent the vulnerability in the software. This customization is critical for tracking and remediating non-standard vulnerabilities in the company's vulnerability management system. SCAP is also valuable, but OVAL within SCAP provides the flexibility needed for this particular situation. So, focusing on OVAL would be the most effective approach.

OVAL is an open standard for defining and sharing information about computer vulnerabilities, configuration issues, and patch statuses. It allows you to create standardized checks for vulnerabilities, which can be used to integrate into vulnerability management systems to identify and assess specific vulnerabilities. - Custom Vulnerability Definitions: Allows the creation of custom vulnerability definitions tailored to the organization's specific software. - Integration with Vulnerability Management Systems: OVAL definitions can be consumed by vulnerability scanners and management systems to detect the presence of vulnerabilities. While SCAP provides a framework for using standardized vulnerability definitions, it relies on existing standards like OVAL for creating and defining those vulnerabilities. Since a standard vulnerability definition does not exist, SCAP alone is insufficient without OVAL.

Ans D. The best option for the engineer to identify the vulnerability in the internally developed software would be: D. OVAL. OVAL (Open Vulnerability and Assessment Language) is designed to provide a standardized method for representing system details and identifying vulnerabilities, making it suitable for tracking and remediation in this context.

SCAP provides a standardized approach to vulnerability identification and remediation, allowing the engineer to track the results in the vulnerability management system, even for custom or internally developed software.