Exam CAS-004 topic 1 question 455 discussion

o Providing proof-of-concept (POC) exploit code can be considered a more aggressive approach and might escalate the situation unnecessarily. Publishing it publicly could further damage the company's reputation and potentially lead to legal repercussions. Therefore, collecting sufficient evidence to demonstrate the vulnerability's existence and impact, while maintaining a responsible and professional approach, is the most recommended course of action. o C. Recommend legal consultation about the process: While legal consultation might be beneficial in complex situations, it's not the first step. The researcher should initially attempt to engage with the company directly, following established vulnerability disclosure procedures. Legal advice can be sought later if the vendor doesn't respond appropriately or if there are disagreements regarding disclosure.

Legal consultation is crucial before proceeding with any vulnerability disclosure process, especially when dealing with vulnerabilities found in former employers' software. It ensures that the researcher adheres to legal and ethical standards, protects their rights, and avoids potential legal risks associated with disclosure. Therefore, advising the security researcher to seek legal consultation is the most prudent course of action in this situation.