A. Redundant equipment
Explanation:
Redundant equipment (e.g., backup servers, network devices, power supplies) ensures high availability by minimizing downtime in case of hardware failure. This is often the most cost-effective method compared to setting up a full disaster recovery site or implementing an extensive continuity plan.
Why Not the Others?
B. Disaster recovery site – While effective, setting up a separate recovery site is costly and typically used for mission-critical operations.
C. Continuity plan – A business continuity plan is important for long-term resilience but does not directly increase availability in real-time.
D. Scheduled maintenance – Regular maintenance prevents failures, but it does not directly improve availability since maintenance often requires downtime.
Thus, redundant equipment (A) is the best cost-effective choice to increase availability.
Scheduled maintenance because regular maintenance helps prevent unexpected failures, ensures optimal system performance, and extends equipment lifespan, all at a lower cost compared to redundant systems or disaster recovery sites.
vs
Redundant equipment increases availability, it is more expensive.
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.FC0-U61 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
lexxone
2 months agoTorrente
2 months, 1 week agoROCompTIA
5 months, 1 week ago