An organization is building a new backup data center with cost-benefit as the primary requirement and RTO and RPO values around two days. Which of the following types of sites is the best for this scenario?
Warm Sites
● Not fully equipped, but fundamentals in place
● Can be up and running within a few days
● Cheaper than hot sites but with a slight delay
Cold Sites
● Fewer facilities than warm sites
● May be just an empty building, ready in 1-2 months
● Cost-effective but adds more recovery time
A warm site offers a balance between cost-effectiveness and recovery time objectives (RTO) and recovery point objectives (RPO). It typically has some pre-installed infrastructure and data backups but may require additional configuration and data restoration before becoming fully operational. Given the RTO and RPO values of around two days, a warm site provides a reasonable compromise between cost and recovery capability.
If you need a balance between cost and recovery speed, a warm site is a good option. If cost is the main concern and downtime of a few days is acceptable, a cold site is better.
A cold site is the best option for the organization's requirements, balancing low cost with an acceptable two-day RTO and RPO, making it the most cost-effective solution.
A cold site is the most cost-effective option for a backup data center because it is essentially an empty facility with basic utilities (e.g., power, cooling, and connectivity) but no active hardware or pre-installed systems. Since the organization has an RTO (Recovery Time Objective) and RPO (Recovery Point Objective) of around two days, a cold site is suitable as it provides enough time to set up and restore operations while keeping costs low.
A cold site is the most cost-effective option because it provides basic infrastructure, such as a physical space with power, cooling, and network connectivity, but it does not have active IT systems or pre-configured data.
Cold sites typically require time to set up the necessary systems, which aligns with the two-day RTO/RPO requirements. They are less expensive compared to hot or warm sites because they do not have pre-installed equipment or active data replication.
A cold site provides the best balance between cost and the organization's relatively long RTO/RPO requirements (two days).
A warm site has some infrastructure pre-configured and can be brought online faster than a cold site, but it is more expensive. This would be suitable for a scenario where RTO and RPO are shorter than two days, but it's overkill for this case.
Cost-benefit doesn't mean the cheapest. What is more beneficial paying cheapest possible for a cold site, and taking possible weeks to get it up and running or paying mid-range for a warm site that can be brought online in hours to a couple of days?
A warm site strikes a balance between cost and recovery time. It typically has hardware and connectivity set up, but systems and data may not be fully up-to-date. This setup allows the organization to recover within the specified RTO and RPO of around two days without the high costs associated with a hot site.
gpt
A warm site offers a balance between cost-effectiveness and recovery speed. While it requires some setup and data restoration during a disaster, this can usually be accomplished within the two-day RTO and RPO window specified by the organization.
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Abcd123321
Highly Voted 10 months, 3 weeks agoSHADTECH123
Highly Voted 10 months, 2 weeks agotsummey
Most Recent 1 month, 1 week agoTurrtle
1 month, 2 weeks agopindinga1
2 months, 2 weeks agoramzie
2 months, 3 weeks agomusaabokisec
3 months agoProudFather
3 months agoBenny_On
3 months, 3 weeks agoDamique
4 months, 1 week agosireyml
4 months, 1 week agoLavette
6 months, 2 weeks agod4a5620
6 months, 4 weeks agoImpactTek
7 months agotamdod
7 months, 2 weeks agoqacollin
7 months, 4 weeks agodbrowndiver
8 months ago