Which of the following architectures reduces network latency by enforcing a limit on the number of switching devices on the frame's path between any internal hosts?
A.
Spine and Leaf Architecture The spine-leaf architecture consists of only two layers of switches spine and leaf switches. The spine layer consists of switches that perform routing and work as the core of the network. The leaf layer involves access switches that connect to servers, storage devices, and other end-users. This structure helps data center networks reduce hop count and reduce network latency.
In collapsed core architecture, the core and distribution layers are combined, simplifying the design.
The three-tier model is necessary for complex campuses that require access by multiple sites, devices and users. It results in a network that is scalable, cost-efficient and reliable for large enterprises. However, smaller campuses can reap similar benefits with a simpler model, scaled down to improve costs and oversight.
https://www.eiresystems.com/what-is-a-collapsed-core-network/#:~:text=In%20collapsed%20core%20architecture%2C%20the,and%20reliable%20for%20large%20enterprises.
The three-tier model is necessary for complex campuses that require access by multiple sites, devices and users. It results in a network that is scalable, cost-efficient and reliable for large enterprises. However, smaller campuses can reap similar benefits with a simpler model, scaled down to improve costs and oversight.
https://www.eiresystems.com/what-is-a-collapsed-core-network/#:~:text=In%20collapsed%20core%20architecture%2C%20the,and%20reliable%20for%20large%20enterprises.
In the collapsed core architecture, the core and distribution layers are combined into a single layer, which reduces the number of hops between devices and the associated latency. This architecture is often used in smaller networks where scalability and complexity are not significant concerns.
Another of those bad questions. Which text book did that guy read before setting this question? It is just a random choice.
Spine and leaf I associate more with scalability and also predictable latency, reduces the number of hops
Collapsed core is mainly for simplicity, and it also avoids the distribution switches.
because I wrote that above and added latency keyword in spine and leaf, I will select spine and leaf. Looks like they open a random book and read a specific page and without any context set a question
A. Spine and leaf architecture reduces network latency by enforcing a limit on the number of switching devices on the frame's path between any internal hosts.
A and D look similar in practice, but Spine and Leaf is explicitly set up to reduce the number of hops between clients and core switches. I would go for A then.
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
abbey0922
Highly Voted 11 months, 2 weeks agoMehsotopes
Most Recent 3 months, 1 week agoMehsotopes
3 months, 1 week agomr_reyes
10 months, 1 week agofamco
10 months, 3 weeks ago[Removed]
11 months, 2 weeks agoAdmiralGimme
11 months, 3 weeks agoStellarSteve
11 months, 3 weeks agoJakub2023
11 months, 4 weeks agoDamonn
11 months, 4 weeks ago