B & C is correct:
The following are the benefits of deploying Cisco Advanced Phishing Protection on the Cisco Email Security Gateway (ESA):
Prevents the following:
Attacks that use compromised accounts and social engineering.
Phishing, ransomware, zero-day attacks and spoofing.
BEC with no malicious payload or URL.
Cisco Umbrella protects users from accessing malicious domains by proactively analyzing and blocking unsafe destinations – before a connection is ever made. Thus it can protect from phishing attacks by blocking suspicious domains when users click on the given links that an attacker sent.
The answer is B & C
The following are the benefits of deploying Cisco Advanced Phishing Protection on the Cisco Email Security Gateway (ESA):
Prevents the following:
+ Attacks that use compromised accounts and social engineering.
+ Phishing, ransomware, zero-day attacks and spoofing.
+ BEC with no malicious payload or URL.
Reference: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/esa/esa13-5/user_guide/b_ESA_Admin_Guide_13-5/m_advanced_phishing_protection.html
Cisco Umbrella protects users from accessing malicious domains by proactively analyzing and blocking unsafe destinations – before a connection is ever made. Thus it can protect from phishing attacks by blocking suspicious domains when users click on the given links that an attacker sent.
BE:
Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) is an email security solution that provides protection against spam, phishing, malware, and other email-borne threats. While it can be an effective tool for preventing employees from receiving phishing emails, it does not provide the same level of protection as Umbrella and FTD. Umbrella is a cloud-based security service that provides protection against phishing and other types of internet-based threats by blocking access to known malicious domains and IP addresses, and FTD is a next-generation firewall that integrates advanced threat protection capabilities, such as intrusion prevention (IPS), advanced malware protection (AMP), and URL filtering. These two solutions focus on the network level, providing the first line of defense and blocking the phishing website before it reaches the employees. While ESA focus on the email level, it can detect and block malicious emails, but it doesn't protect the device from visiting a malicious website.
I would go for B and C, according to the links below:
https://trustportal.cisco.com/c/dam/r/ctp/docs/privacydatasheet/security/cisco-advanced-phishing-privacy-data-sheet.pdf
https://umbrella.cisco.com/trends-threats/how-to-stop-and-block-phishing-attacks
upvoted 4 times
...
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.350-701 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
petestudies
10 months, 2 weeks agoIETF1
10 months, 2 weeks agoums008
1 year, 3 months agoDirectly_Connected
1 year, 7 months agosull3y
1 year, 9 months agoEmlia1
1 year, 10 months agoMedusa8
1 year, 10 months agoYmerG
1 year, 10 months ago