exam questions

Exam 200-201 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the 200-201 exam

Exam 200-201 topic 1 question 241 discussion

Actual exam question from Cisco's 200-201
Question #: 241
Topic #: 1
[All 200-201 Questions]


Refer to the exhibit. A workstation downloads a malicious .docx file from the Internet and a copy is sent to FTDv. The FTDv sends the file hash to FMC and the file event is recorded. What would have occurred with stronger data visibility?

  • A. An extra level of security would have been in place.
  • B. Malicious traffic would have been blocked on multiple devices.
  • C. The traffic would have been monitored at any segment in the network.
  • D. Detailed information about the data in real time would have been provided.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
sheyshey
6 days ago
Selected Answer: D
i'd go with D. it's about visibility, not protection
upvoted 3 times
...
SecurityGuy
3 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
The question already gave us the information that the file is Malicious,  yet it has not been blocked and has just been recorded by FMC. If we had stronger data visibility, detailed information about the data in real time would have been provided, and malicious traffic would have been blocked on multiple devices. This is indeed a tricky question, but I do think that it asks what the "End Result" here  if there is stronger data visibility.
upvoted 1 times
...
itousattud
8 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: D
With stronger data visibility, the security team would have more detailed and real-time information about the malicious .docx file, allowing them to better detect, analyze, and respond to the threat. This could include more granular information about the file's characteristics, behavior, and network traffic patterns, as well as visibility across multiple devices and network segments. This could help to improve threat detection and response capabilities and enhance overall security posture. So, why not B? Option B could also be a possible answer, as stronger data visibility could enable multiple devices to block malicious traffic. However, option D more accurately describes the benefits of stronger data visibility in this specific scenario, as it mentions providing detailed information about the data in real time. Option D emphasizes the importance of having a comprehensive view of network traffic and being able to quickly identify and respond to potential threats.
upvoted 4 times
...
lacacot
9 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: D
The question is what would have occurred with stronger data visibility. Not what should be implemented for better protection.
upvoted 2 times
...
MartinRB
9 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: D
could be a D aswell
upvoted 2 times
...
weganos
11 months ago
Selected Answer: C
The question asks about stronger visibility not better protection.
upvoted 1 times
...
weganos
11 months, 2 weeks ago
The question states "stronger data visibility" so not better protection. So I would assume the answer could be C too?
upvoted 1 times
...
Eng_ahmedyoussef
1 year, 2 months ago
Selected Answer: B
B. Malicious traffic would have been blocked on multiple devices.
upvoted 1 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago