exam questions

Exam 300-410 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the 300-410 exam

Exam 300-410 topic 1 question 278 discussion

Actual exam question from Cisco's 300-410
Question #: 278
Topic #: 1
[All 300-410 Questions]


Refer to the exhibit. An engineer implemented CoPP but did not see OSPF traffic going through it. Which configuration resolves the issue?

  • A. control-plane service-policy input COPP
  • B. policy-map COPP class OSFP police 8000 conform-action transmit exceed-action transmit violate-action drop
  • C. ip access-list extended OSFP permit ospf any any
  • D. class-map match-all OSFP match access-group name OSFP
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
HungarianDish_111
Highly Voted 1 year, 8 months ago
Selected Answer: C
"A" and "D" are already applied, "B" is not required as traffic only needs to be captured and not limited, so "drop" is incorrect. "C" is correct, however it would be enough to set the appropriate source and destination IP pairs, as Aikat and others wrote.
upvoted 6 times
HungarianDish_111
1 year, 8 months ago
https://community.cisco.com/t5/switching/ospf-dies-when-apply-acl/td-p/794381 This thread suggested to use "permit ospf any any" for simplicity, because of the multicast addressing.
upvoted 3 times
...
...
wwwwaaaa
Most Recent 1 month ago
Selected Answer: C
Existing ACL permits R3 to R4 and vise versa to form OSPF neighborship what we see is that R1 is the one forming the neighborship with both R3 and R4, and for that we either need to monitor source/destinations in the ACL, or simply add ospf any any
upvoted 2 times
...
kldoyle97
3 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: C
The ACL is identifying traffic from R4 to R3 and vice versa, I don't think there is any multihop communication for ospf. ospf traffic is contained to the local segment (hellos, LSAs, DR/BDR)
upvoted 1 times
...
[Removed]
6 months ago
Selected Answer: C
C is correct
upvoted 1 times
...
bk989
11 months, 2 weeks ago
Verified in GNS3: exact configuration without option C: R1#show policy-map control-plane Control Plane Service-policy input: COPP Class-map: OSPF (match-all) 0 packets, 0 bytes 5 minute offered rate 0000 bps, drop rate 0000 bps Match: access-group name OSPF police: cir 8000 bps, bc 1500 bytes conformed 0 packets, 0 bytes; actions: transmit exceeded 0 packets, 0 bytes; actions: transmit conformed 0000 bps, exceeded 0000 bps Class-map: class-default (match-any) 46 packets, 6244 bytes 5 minute offered rate 0000 bps, drop rate 0000 bps Match: any
upvoted 1 times
bk989
11 months, 2 weeks ago
With option C: R1#show policy-map control-plane Control Plane Service-policy input: COPP Class-map: OSPF (match-all) 14 packets, 1316 bytes 5 minute offered rate 0000 bps, drop rate 0000 bps Match: access-group name OSPF We see packets now. The reason: There are no ospf control plane packets between routers R4 and R3 in the diagram. However when adding option C to the acl we now match control plane packets destined to our router.
upvoted 3 times
...
...
guy276465281819372
1 year, 5 months ago
Selected Answer: C
definitely C
upvoted 2 times
...
inteldarvid
1 year, 6 months ago
Selected Answer: C
100 %%% is "C"
upvoted 2 times
...
Mikedask
1 year, 10 months ago
if the acl wasnt right then why we have full ospf adj?....i mean we have hellos exhange full/bdr and right ospf process. if we hasnt full state then the right answer will be the c but i think the copp policy must be configured A
upvoted 1 times
yefrimart
1 year, 3 months ago
Remember than when the traffic do not match the policy it simply does not apply the policy and the traffic is treated normally. That is why we have full adjacencies between the routers.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
Aikat
1 year, 10 months ago
pay attention to IP pairs: - 10.2.2.4 <> 10.2.2.1 - 10.1.1.1 <> 10.1.1.3 then check what's allowed in the ACL. Answer is C
upvoted 2 times
...
MD_Shox
2 years, 1 month ago
Selected Answer: C
this is mcast and in addition look carefully at R1 R2 R3 interface ip addresses only C can solve it from the listed answers and will catch bot R1<-R2 and R2<->R3
upvoted 3 times
...
VergilP
2 years, 2 months ago
Selected Answer: C
seems like ..... should be C because of the multicast.. I'm not very sure but I vote for C https://community.cisco.com/t5/routing/access-list-ospf/td-p/781095
upvoted 3 times
...
Edwinmolinab
2 years, 2 months ago
Selected Answer: C
Given answer is correct tested on GNS3
upvoted 3 times
...
chris7890
2 years, 3 months ago
Selected Answer: A
The configured policy map must be assigned in the control plan https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/15-0SY/configuration/guide/15_0_sy_swcg/control_plane_policing_copp.pdf
upvoted 3 times
VergilP
2 years, 2 months ago
why? i see the COPP is already config? the first two line of the left picture...
upvoted 2 times
...
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago