Exam 350-401 topic 1 question 98 discussion

The answer is correct, but the way they store the question is ridiculous

R1 will not be able to reach server at 172.16.0.1. IP address and subnet (172.16.x.x) on e0/0 is overlaping with the address of the server on the other "LAN" interface. So the LAN interface have to be either on the default vrf or on a new vrf to be able to reach the server. With this config, vrf bank will not be able to cummunicate with default vrf or any other vrf.

OK, it's C, let me explain why, placing the interface e0/0 as "forwarding" vrf Bank on R1 and enabling ospf as vrf Bank on e0/0 interface would advertise the route to R2 as LSA1 and would get it into Bank vrf routing table on R2 as O , but the global route leak would NOT be necessary to reach the server at 172.16.0.1 , this is ospf feature: peer interface doesn't have to forward a specific vrf to be the next hop , because ospf would find the best route...

The answer C is correct; but if R1 adjacent with R2 through OSPF should be OSPF 42 VRF NOT OSPF 44 VRF like in R2

C is correct

Answer is C: A & D have ospf Configuration issue. B is configured for hotel and we need it for the bank. Then C is correct.

Admins, please fix the formatting of the answers in this question, as it is it's incomprehensible.

i could see the exam guys tricking you by making one of the answer have the same 42 ospf process id, with the wrong rest of the config. keep in mind this: To enable the OSPF process on the router, use the router ospf process-id command. Process ID numbers between neighbors do not need to match for the routers to establish an OSPF adjacency. https://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=2294214#:~:text=To%20enable%20the%20OSPF%20process,to%20establish%20an%20OSPF%20adjacency.

Answer is C A. interface Ethernet0/0 ip address 172.16.0.7 255.255.0.0 router ospf 44 vrf bank network 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 B. interface Ethernet0/0 vrf forwarding hotel ip address 172.16.0.7 255.255.0.0 router ospf 44 vrf Hotel network 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 C. interface Ethernet0/0 vrf forwarding bank ip address 172.16.0.7 255.255.0.0 router ospf 44 vrf bank network 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0 D. interface Ethernet0/0 ip address 172.16.0.7 255.255.0.0 router ospf 44 vrf hotel network 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0

C is correct

VRF's on R1 and R3 are exactly as it should

voting. provided answer is correct

C may not necessarily be the answer because interfaces E0/0 and E0/1 on R2 are noted to be part of specific vrf while the LAN interface isn't said to be part of a specific vrf, meaning that LAN of R2 can be part of DEFAULT VRF as IPs can overlap in different vrf. if tha's the case, then R1 can no route to the R2 LAN as they have no connection as shown.

Provided answer is correct