exam questions

Exam 350-401 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the 350-401 exam

Exam 350-401 topic 1 question 274 discussion

Actual exam question from Cisco's 350-401
Question #: 274
Topic #: 1
[All 350-401 Questions]

Which outbound access list, applied to the WAN interface of a router, permits all traffic except for http traffic sourced from the workstation with IP address
10.10.10.1?

  • A. ip access-list extended 200 deny tcp host 10.10.10.1 eq 80 any permit ip any any
  • B. ip access-list extended 10 deny tcp host 10.10.10.1 any eq 80 permit ip any any
  • C. ip access-list extended NO_HTTP deny tcp host 10.10.10.1 any eq 80
  • D. ip access-list extended 100 deny tcp host 10.10.10.1 any eq 80 permit ip any any
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Sajj_gabi
Highly Voted 4 years, 2 months ago
Defo D as its an extended ACL the range is betwee 100-199 Router(config)#ip access-list extended ? <100-199> Extended IP access-list number <2000-2699> Extended IP access-list number (expanded range) WORD Access-list name
upvoted 12 times
danman32
1 year, 9 months ago
Hmm. But numbers can also be an access-list name, can't it?
upvoted 2 times
...
...
KZM
Highly Voted 2 years, 5 months ago
A. 200 is out of extended access-list range (Available range is 100-199) -> Wrong B. 10 is out of extended access-list range (Available range is 100-199) -> Wrong C. The extended access-list with the name NO_HTTP can be configured. But as per the command, all traffic will block due to not execute the command permit ip any any ->Wrong D. Correct Router(config)#ip access-list extended 100 Router(config-ext-nacl)#deny tcp host 10.10.10.1 any eq 80 Router(config-ext-nacl)#permit ip any any
upvoted 7 times
...
AbdullahMohammad251
Most Recent 8 months, 1 week ago
None of the options is correct! Options A, B, and D are incorrect because the `ip access-list [standard|extended]` command is used with named ACLs. - **Option A**: Incorrect syntax. The service type `eq 80` must be specified after the destination address. The correct syntax is: 'access-list [NUMBER] [permit|deny] [source] [wildcard-mask] [destination] [wildcard-mask] [eq [service-type]]' - **Option B**: Incorrect range for the ACL ID. For extended ACLs, the valid ranges are 100-199 and 2000-2699. - **Option C** is missing the `permit ip any any` command to allow all other traffic (that is not HTTP sourced from `10.10.10.1`). - **Option D**: Would be correct if it didn’t include `ip` and 'extended' keywords.
upvoted 1 times
AbdullahMohammad251
8 months, 1 week ago
Important note: Named ACLs cannot solely use numbers as their names.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
[Removed]
11 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: D
D is correct Outbound , so you want to block the Workstation from accessing the WAN using port 80
upvoted 1 times
...
eearmani
1 year, 3 months ago
Selected Answer: D
deny tcp ( host ) ( source ) eq port 8080 and then permit any
upvoted 1 times
...
mgiuseppe86
1 year, 7 months ago
A. ip access-list extended 200 deny tcp host 10.10.10.1 eq 80 any permit ip any any B. ip access-list extended 10 deny tcp host 10.10.10.1 any eq 80 permit ip any any C. ip access-list extended NO_HTTP deny tcp host 10.10.10.1 any eq 80 D. ip access-list extended 100 deny tcp host 10.10.10.1 any eq 80 permit ip any any
upvoted 1 times
...
danman32
1 year, 9 months ago
In all cases, we're dealing with a NAMED access list. Why? Because it is 'ip access-list [standard|extended] <name> ...' rather than 'access-list <number> [permit|deny] ...' The ACL name just happens to be numbers. So B can also be the correct answer, ACL name being 10. Unless there's a typo somewhere in the answers compared to what's actually on the test. It just happens that the na
upvoted 1 times
Chuckzero
1 year, 8 months ago
C cannot be the correct answer because of implicit deny. There is not permit statement.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
Clauster
2 years, 1 month ago
Selected Answer: D
Correct Answer is D however, there is a typo, it should be written like this: ip access-list extended 100 deny tcp host 10.10.10.1 eq 80 any < Source host 10.10.10.1 eq 80 going to any destination. The way that the answer has it written that's a destination Port not a source. permit ip any any
upvoted 2 times
danman32
1 year, 9 months ago
With the way you propose it be written, you'd be specifying that the source port be 80, not the destination. We want to block from 10.10.10.1 with any source port to any destination, destination port 80. The way you suggest, it instead would be: from 10.10.10.1 source port 80 to any destination with any destination port. Not what we want.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
H3kerman
2 years, 6 months ago
Selected Answer: D
D. ip access-list extended 100 <name of acl> deny tcp host 10.10.10.1 <source ip> <any source port> any <any destination ip> eq 80 <destination port> permit ip any any
upvoted 3 times
...
BigMouthDog
2 years, 9 months ago
The difference between ans A nad D is not only the etended list number range, it also "eq 80 any" and "any eq 80"
upvoted 2 times
...
[Removed]
3 years, 11 months ago
The given answer is correct
upvoted 3 times
...
BigMomma4752
4 years, 1 month ago
D is the correct answer.
upvoted 2 times
...
Facco
4 years, 1 month ago
Correct Answer: D. Syntax: [insert line-num] deny tcp {source-ip [wildcard] | host source-ip | any} [operator port [port]]{dest-ip [wildcard] | host dest-ip | any} [operator port [port]] [established] https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/app_ntwk_services/waas/waas/v401_v403/command/reference/cmdref/ext_acl.pdf
upvoted 2 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago