Which two OSPF design considerations should you implement to support the eventual growth of a network, so that CPU and memory are unaffected by the size and complexity of the link-state database in a large service provider network? (Choose two.)
BC - Agree with Josh
Answer: B,C
Explanation:
Do not change the packet-pacing timers unless all other options to meet OSPF packet flooding requirements have been exhausted. Specifically, network operators should prefer summarization, stub area usage, queue tuning, and buffer tuning before changing the default timers.Furthermore, there are no guidelinesfor changing timer values; each OSPFdeployment is unique and should be considered on a case-by-case basis. The network operator assumes risks that are associated with changing the default timer values.
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/iproute_ospf/configuration/xe-16-6/iro-xe-16-6-book/iro-update.html
This section is not available anymore. Please use the main Exam Page.352-001 Exam Questions
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
A_Wolf
4 years, 3 months agojoshuat
4 years, 4 months ago