R1 is a L2 router ("area router")
R2 is a L1 router ("station router")
They will not form an adjacency (although if either of them were configured as L1/L2, which is the default, they could)
The NET (in Cisco's format) is formed by three parts:
- the area-id (single octet plus two additional bytes)
- the system-id (six octets)
- the SEL
Systems with same area-id can become L1 neighbors.
Systems with different area-ids can become L2 neighbors.
The NET for R1 is: 52.0011.0000.0000.0001.00
- area-id 52.0011
- system-id 0000.0000.0001
- the SEL is 00
The NET for R2 is: 52.0022.0000.0000.0002.00
- area-id 52.0022
- system-id 0000.0000.0002
- the SEL is 00
Therefore R1 and R2 are in different areas.
R2 is an L1 router, and thus cannot form an adjacency with R1 in a different area.
So there are two reasons why they cannot form an adjacency.
Answer: D
Sorry guys, I believe I was wrong with D:
A is correct. If you change the area type on R2 to level-2 it will work
D is wrong. Neighbor is not down because of the area ID, changing the area ID will not fix this if you leave the area type as level-1
D is not my favorite answer , even if you match the area, ISIS nbr wont come up as R1 is Level 1 only router and R2 is Level 2 only router, as per below documentation L1 and L2 only device will not form any ardency
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/integrated-intermediate-system-to-intermediate-system-is-is/200293-IS-IS-Adjacency-and-Area-Types.html#anc5
(check the IS-IS Adjacency Table)
so A looks a better ans if "area type" is referring to "is-tyoe"
An L1 adjacency is formed only with routers in the same area.
An L2 adjacency is formed with routers in the same area or a different area.
An ISIS router will form L1 and L2 adjacencies by default with a router in the same area.
We see that:
Router 1 is level-2 area 52.0011
Router 2 is level-1 area 52.0022
D is correct. Read carefully https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/integrated-intermediate-system-to-intermediate-system-is-is/200293-IS-IS-Adjacency-and-Area-Types.html
For the answer A, we have 3 cases when they have same area type:
1. both are in area type 1 -> it will not work because different area (0011 vs 0022)
2. both are in area type 2 -> it will work because area difference does not matter
3. both are in area type1-2 -> it will work because area difference does not matter
So the logic tells us that case 1 will invalidate this answer.
The remaining vaild answer is D
D is correct. It doesn't even matter the area, as the routers will send different different hello messages (L1 and L2 hellos) and they will not form an adjacency.
D is not MORE correct than A... it's the only correct answer. It's not more specific it's not more anything... A is WRONG!!! Before you spew useless information using the Cisco documentation why don't you actually demonstrate the nonesense you are passing on.... Try in the lab and tell me I'm wrong... I dare you.
Answer is A
L1/L2
L1 Adjacency if Area Id Matches, else no Adjacency
L1 and L2 Adjacency if Area id Matches , else only L2 Adjacency
L2 Adjacency , Area Id doesn’t matter
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/integrated-intermediate-system-to-intermediate-system-is-is/200293-IS-IS-Adjacency-and-Area-Types.html#:~:text=Level%201%20corresponds%20OSPF%20intra,for%20easy%20configuration%20and%20deployment.
wow maybe if I actually think instead of posting I could avoid an embarrassment as this ^
D is the answer, like someone said "it is more specific"
Although A is right, L2 and L2 routers can still form adjacencies so answer A would be wrong.
D is correct because Router 1 is L1 and also different areas!
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
wilmo
Highly Voted 4 years, 5 months agoMvwp
Highly Voted 4 years, 5 months agokirrim
Most Recent 3 days, 20 hours agoric859
3 weeks, 1 day agokekepipi
10 months, 2 weeks agoLandawap
1 year, 4 months agothejag
1 year, 5 months agoJNCIS
1 year, 6 months agothejag
1 year, 6 months agothejag
1 year, 10 months agothejag
1 year, 5 months agoKazekage
2 years, 9 months agocraterman
2 years, 11 months agoROJUCS
3 years, 2 months agorans3001
3 years, 5 months agoserban_17
3 years, 5 months agoNet_Dio
3 years, 5 months agobeenardino
3 years, 6 months agobeenardino
3 years, 6 months agoDhoney75
3 years, 9 months ago