Refer to the exhibit. Routers R1 and R2 exchange routes to each other's loopback through OSPF. Telnet traffic must be blocked from R2 Lo0 to R1 Lo2. Which configuration resolves the issue?
A == Wrongly states "ipv6 access-class..." under lo2 "should be: "ipv6 access-filter..."
B == Wrongly states "ipv6 access-class..." under gi0/0/0 "should be: "ipv6 access-filter..."
C == Best Answer, still wrong: Seems blocking traffic correctly under gi0/0/0 using "ipv6 access-filter...", however, the lo2 IP does not match destination IP in ACL
D == Wrong Does not state "ipv6 access-class..." or "ipv6 access-filter..." anywhere
You cannot apply an IPv6 access list directly to an interface in the same way as you would with an IPv4 access list. Instead, to filter IPv6 traffic, you must use the ipv6 traffic-filter
You can't apply an access-class at the interface level, it only works on vty lines. I tested this with an access-group/traffic-filter and it still had the desired effect of blocking the management plane.
the difference between B and C is that B is referencing the accesslist as an accees class and c as a traffic filter
upvoted 4 times
...
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Pietjeplukgeluk
Highly Voted 7 months, 1 week agobk989
6 months, 4 weeks ago0d2257b
2 months, 3 weeks agoSammy3637
Most Recent 1 week, 1 day ago[Removed]
6 months, 3 weeks ago[Removed]
6 months, 4 weeks agovitalizator
8 months agourushi
7 months, 4 weeks agodapardo
8 months ago