exam questions

Exam 300-410 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the 300-410 exam

Exam 300-410 topic 1 question 568 discussion

Actual exam question from Cisco's 300-410
Question #: 568
Topic #: 1
[All 300-410 Questions]

Which two reasons would cause an LSP to break between two PE routers? (Choose two.)

  • A. lost LDP adjacency
  • B. matching labels
  • C. prefix mismatch
  • D. IGP hello adjacency
  • E. MPLS not enabled
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: AC 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Kojy
3 weeks, 2 days ago
Selected Answer: AC
cause LSP break !!! i think if mpls is not enabled there's no LSP in first place
upvoted 3 times
...
tubirubs
4 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: AE
Prefix mismatch would more likely cause routing issues, but it is not directly related to the LSP breaking, as LSPs are built using label information rather than IP prefix information directly.
upvoted 1 times
...
[Removed]
5 months ago
Selected Answer: AC
A & C are correct The label bindings must correspond to the prefixes and subnet masks in the routing tables. If there's a mismatch, the labels will not be used properly, causing the LSP to fail. i think E is incorrect, if MPLS is not enabled on the routers, there won’t be any LSPs to break. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/multiprotocol-label-switching-mpls/mpls/23565-troubleshoot-mpls-vpn.html#cause:~:text=If%20label%20bindings,devices%20will%20fail.
upvoted 2 times
bk989
4 months, 3 weeks ago
Correct and taken from the link you provided: If label bindings are received from a downstream neighbor for prefixes (including subnet mask) which do not appear in a router's routing and CEF tables, these bindings will not be used. In a similar manner, if a router advertises labels for a subnet/subnet mask pair, which do not correspond to the routing updates also advertised by this router for the same subnet/subnet mask pair, these labels will not be used by upstream neighbors and the Label Switched Path (LSP) between these devices will fail.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
jabal93
5 months, 1 week ago
AC A: Like many other protocols, LDP first establishes a (neighbor adjacency) before it exchanges label information. and each router has unique LSR. C: When we use LDP on Cisco IOS, we locally generate a label for each prefix that we can find in the RIB, except for BGP prefixes. This information is then added to the LIB (Label Information Base). The information in the LIB is used to build the LFIB (Label Forwarding Information Base). When the router has to forward a packet with a MPLS label on it, it will use the LFIB for forwarding decisions. I don't think E is accurate as if MPLS not enabled the Adjacency between the PEs will not form the start, my hint the question asking about already formed session and got broken.
upvoted 1 times
...
Pietjeplukgeluk
6 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: AE
I thought A and E. Anyway, it do not think LSP break with prefix mismatch, so personally C is wrong. A & E seem best here
upvoted 1 times
...
dapardo
7 months, 4 weeks ago
Im not sure on A because of the word "adjacency". I mean LDP issues yes, would cause the break between PE routers but adjacency?
upvoted 1 times
...
Deejay18
8 months, 3 weeks ago
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/multiprotocol-label-switching-mpls/mpls/23565-troubleshoot-mpls-vpn.html#cause I think its CE
upvoted 1 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago