B is the correct answer.
https://community.cisco.com/t5/security-knowledge-base/ca/ta-p/3114159#:~:text=As%20part%20of%20a%20public%20key%20infrastructure%20%28PKI%29%2C,information%2C%20the%20CA%20can%20then%20issue%20a%20certificate.
The answer is B:
"Vetting (verifying) the identity of the website owner or organization: When you request a certificate from CA, it verifies the information you provide. This information includes the organization’s name, domain name, address, email address and a public key.....If the certification authority realizes it has improperly issued a certificate, it revokes the certificate and issues a new one for the same entity.
If the CA discovers that the certificate used by an entity is a counterfeit, it revokes the certificate and adds it to the Certificate Revocation List (CRL)."
The question is based on the wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certificate_authority
"In cryptography, a certificate authority or certification authority (CA) is an entity that stores, signs, and issues digital certificates."
You can find answer C) word by word there.
A digital certificate certifies the ownership of a public key by the named subject of the certificate. This allows others (relying parties) to rely upon signatures or on assertions made about the private key that corresponds to the certified public key.
...and a similar description to A)
The certificate is also a confirmation or validation by the CA that the public key contained in the certificate belongs to the person, organization, server or other entity noted in the certificate.
I'm with Tthurston1 on this one, so C.
I might be wrong, but, at the end of the day, the CA is there to confirm that only the subject can decrypt the message encrypted with its public key and that a message that can be decrypted with the public key was definitely encrypted by the subject via private.
In my view C is the scope, A&B are processes done in order to achieve the goal.
CA doesn't directly validate any certificate. If you want to check if a certificate is valide, you just check if it's signed by CA( or above) and if it is still valid! So, A can not be correct! I go for B.
??? Where's your source to backup such a claim?
On the contrary, CA's DO VALIDATE certificates!
Taken from: www.digicert.com/blog/what-is-a-certificate-authority
"However, CAs VALIDATE organizations and individuals to help ensure that only legitimate websites get a TLS certificate."
"Before issuing a certificate, the CA WILL VERIFY the certificate requester’s information, like site ownership, name, location and more. CAs must adhere to stringent industry standards to ensure that every CA follows similar requirements for validation."
In the grand scheme of things, Options A-C are ALL VALID functions of a CA in a PKI infrastructure. But of course, you can only choose one answer.....
I would opt for Option C because it emphasizes the critical aspect of verifying ownership of the PUBLIC key by the named subject.
The CA acts as a trusted entity in a PKI, verifying the identity of entities requesting digital certificates and issuing certificates that bind a public key to a trusted subject. This binding of identity to a public key is the foundation of trust in PKI-based secure communication.
In a PKI (Public Key Infrastructure), the purpose of a CA (Certificate Authority) is to issue, manage, and revoke digital certificates. The CA plays a central role in establishing trust and enabling secure communication within the PKI ecosystem. Here are the key purposes of a CA:
I would argue here, it could be A) as well. I as user or scripts are able to "issue" or "revoke" certificates, but only CA can grant authenticity...
upvoted 4 times
...
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
Girmiti
4 days, 13 hours agoton99
2 months, 1 week agoDemon_Queen_Velverosa
3 months, 1 week agoPremium_Pils
4 months, 3 weeks agoPremium_Pils
4 months, 3 weeks agoPremium_Pils
4 months, 3 weeks agoBubu3k
6 months agoMocix
6 months, 1 week agoTthurston1
5 months, 3 weeks agoTthurston1
6 months, 4 weeks agoTthurston1
6 months, 4 weeks agonot_so_free
10 months, 3 weeks agomikexian
11 months, 4 weeks agoCCNPWILL
1 year, 1 month agoytsionis
1 year, 3 months agomazimir
1 year, 6 months ago