C is correct
https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81_SecurityManagement_AdminGuide/Topics-SECMG/Ordered-Layers-and-Inline-Layers.htm
https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Management/Policy-Layers-in-R80-x/td-p/1717
and
https://community.checkpoint.com/legacyfs/online/checkpoint/40533_pastedImage_4.png
from post of fepe15, the parent rule is the part of inline layer and the matching continues to next rule of ordered layer if parent rule is mismatch. So answer C is incorrect, it describes any inline layer isn't matched.
The Inline Layer has a parent rule (Rule 2 in the example), and sub rules (Rules 2.1 and 2.2). The Action of the parent rule is the name of the Inline Layer.
If the packet does not match the parent rule of the Inline Layer, the matching continues to the next rule of the Ordered Layer (Rule 3).
If a packet matches the parent rule of the Inline Layer (Rule 2), the Security Gateway checks it against the sub rules:
If the packet matches a sub rule in the Inline Layer (Rule 2.1), no more rule matching is done.
If none of the higher rules in the Ordered Layer match the packet, the explicit Cleanup Rule is applied (Rule 2.2). If this rule is missing, the Implicit Cleanup Rule is applied (see Types of Rules in the Rule Base). No more rule matching is done.
Important - Always add an explicit Cleanup Rule at the end of each Inline Layer, and make sure that its Action is the same as the Action of the Implicit Cleanup Rule.
For sure the C is the correct answer: Here is from the checkpoint document:
If the packet does not match the parent rule of the Inline Layer, the matching continues to the next rule of the Ordered Layer (Rule 3).
If a packet matches the parent rule of the Inline Layer (Rule 2), the Security Gateway checks it against the sub rules:
If the packet matches a sub rule in the Inline Layer (Rule 2.1), no more rule matching is done.
If none of the higher rules in the Ordered Layer match the packet, the explicit Cleanup Rule is applied (Rule 2.2). If this rule is missing, the Implicit Cleanup Rule is applied (see Types of Rules in the Rule Base). No more rule matching is done.
https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81_SecurityManagement_AdminGuide/Topics-SECMG/Ordered-Layers-and-Inline-Layers.htm
End of questions, it's C
https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R80.40/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R80.40_SecurityManagement_AdminGuide/Content/Topics-SECMG/Ordered-Layers-and-Inline-Layers.htm
If none of the higher rules in the Ordered Layer match the packet, the explicit Cleanup Rule is applied (Rule 2.2). If this rule is missing, the Implicit Cleanup Rule is applied (see Types of Rules in the Rule Base). No more rule matching is done.
C could be WRONG because it's written very bad: it talks about matching IMPLICIT CLEANUP, but according to the best practices, you should have an EXPLICIT CLEANUP (I'm sure all of you have defined an EXPLICIT "Note - If you use the Cleanup rule as the last explicit rule, the Last Implied Rule and the Implicit Cleanup Rule are not enforced"
And I want add to the discussion that an inline layer is A PART of an Ordered Layers. So it's not so obvious that when the packet does not match any inline layers it will finish on the cleanup. That's because the rule base is not composed only of inline layers ;)
My2cents
I agree with you to some extent, however, the fact that it has reached an inline layer means that it has already fallen under the category of an ordered layer and as a result, I would think that it would either have to match one of the inline layers to that ordered layer rule or else be subject to implicit rules - seeing as an explicit cleanup rule would be an ordered layer rule, to which the packet would no longer be able to be checked by, having already 'entered' another ordered layer rule.
Mylackofcents
To me the one that makes most sense is C.
As I understand it, if the packet does not match any of the inline layers, that means we have arrived at the end of a specific ordered layer, and at the end there is always the Implicit Clean=up Rule, which discards the packet.
B However, matching an inline layer, doesn't mean you continue to the next layer, because if the rule matched in the inline layer is an action DROP, then nothing else will be checked.
C is correct, read below for clarity.
https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R80.40/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R80.40_SecurityManagement_AdminGuide/Content/Topics-SECMG/Ordered-Layers-and-Inline-Layers.htm
I think the correct answer is C.
From the reference provided in explanation: In Ordered Layers when an accept rule from the first layer is matched, the gateway goes over the rules in the next layer.
In Inline Layers only traffic matched/accepted on the parent rule will reach and be inspected by the inside layer rules.
The question is about inline layer, not ordered layer!
You're not right. The explanation of the answer is shown in the following pic. You can see, that an inline layer is matched and the the gateway goes over to the next layer. It goes from an inline layer of "access layer" to the "content layer". So B is right!
https://community.checkpoint.com/legacyfs/online/checkpoint/40533_pastedImage_4.png
Matching an inline layer doesn't mean, that packet will continue matching the next layer. It would have to match a subrule that would have to accept the packet.
Option C seems to be the best for me.
upvoted 4 times
...
...
...
Log in to ExamTopics
Sign in:
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.
Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one.
So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.
gielda211
1 year, 11 months agoTroglodyte
2 years, 4 months agoKenLui
2 years, 5 months agofepe15
3 years, 3 months agofepe15
3 years, 3 months agoShabVj
3 years, 3 months agoDUGDUGDUG
3 years, 4 months agochst
3 years, 9 months agosaicosocial
3 years, 9 months agotheManFromRoom5
3 years, 5 months agomrXam
3 years, 9 months agomauchi
3 years, 10 months agoAychi
4 years agoAychi
4 years agomauchi
3 years, 10 months agoHernan_Mella
2 years, 4 months agowakopro
4 years, 1 month agoRafael_Lara
4 years, 3 months agosecuritygeek
4 years, 3 months agoHernan_Mella
2 years, 4 months agoLevis
4 years, 4 months agoTimber
4 years, 5 months agoC4rlos
4 years, 7 months agosecadmin44
4 years, 7 months agoC4rlos
4 years, 6 months ago