Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.
exam questions

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 exam

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 topic 1 question 212 discussion

A company needs to export its database once a day to Amazon S3 for other teams to access. The exported object size varies between 2 GB and 5 GB. The S3 access pattern for the data is variable and changes rapidly. The data must be immediately available and must remain accessible for up to 3 months. The company needs the most cost-effective solution that will not increase retrieval time.

Which S3 storage class should the company use to meet these requirements?

  • A. S3 Intelligent-Tiering
  • B. S3 Glacier Instant Retrieval
  • C. S3 Standard
  • D. S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA)
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?) , you can switch to a simple comment.
Switch to a voting comment New
techhb
Highly Voted 1 year, 9 months ago
Selected Answer: A
S3 Intelligent-Tiering monitors access patterns and moves objects that have not been accessed for 30 consecutive days to the Infrequent Access tier and after 90 days of no access to the Archive Instant Access tier.
upvoted 20 times
Devsin2000
1 year, 5 months ago
https://aws.amazon.com/getting-started/hands-on/getting-started-using-amazon-s3-intelligent-tiering/
upvoted 5 times
...
...
pentium75
Highly Voted 9 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: A
I think it cannot be clearly answered because we know that the 'access pattern is variable and changes rapidly', but ultimately it depends on the total number and volume of accesses. All four options meet the "not increase retrieval time" requirement (even Glacier Instant Retrieval has "the same latency and access time as S3 Standard"). If data would be rarely accessed, B would be cheapest. If it would be constantly accessed, C would be cheapest (we'd pay the Intelligent Tiering fee but it would never move anything to a cheaper tier). Inbetween it would be D. But I guess the key is Amazon's clear recommendation to use Intelligent Tiering (A) for "unknown or changing access" patterns, which matches the statement in the question.
upvoted 8 times
...
ensbrvsnss
Most Recent 1 month, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
Instant
upvoted 1 times
...
lofzee
4 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: A
unknown / changing access patterns = intelligent tiering. memorise
upvoted 3 times
...
ManikRoy
5 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: A
Unpredictable access pattern - Intelligent tiering
upvoted 2 times
...
MehulKapadia
6 months ago
Selected Answer: A
Correct Answer A: When data access pattern is not known then Intelligent-tiering can help by monitoring data-access pattern and move object internally accordingly an still ensure faster retrieval. Also There is no object retrieval fees/changes for S3 Intelligent Tier(So cost savings). Option C is not a valid answer because name itself says Infrequent Access(IA): S3 Standard-IA is for data that is accessed less frequently.
upvoted 2 times
...
Uzbekistan
6 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: C
Immediate Availability: S3 Standard provides immediate access to the data upon upload. This ensures that the exported database is immediately available for other teams to access without any retrieval delays. Variable Access Pattern: S3 Standard is designed to handle variable access patterns efficiently. It can accommodate rapid changes in access patterns without any impact on performance or latency. Retention Period: S3 Standard is suitable for storing data that needs to remain accessible for up to 3 months. It does not have any retrieval fees or delays, making it ideal for this scenario where immediate access is required.
upvoted 3 times
...
escalibran
7 months, 1 week ago
Feels like half the scenario or answers are missing. Where's the "remove objects after 90 days"? Intelligent Tiering has an upcharge for the provided convenience - does it even make sense, when objects won't remain long enough to be archived? Other classes trade storage cost for request costs. Dependent on how often objects are queried, IA might make sense. Even Glacier Instant Retrieval could come out ahead, given minimal access (and it has 90 days minimum storage duration, exact fit for the description). With no further details provided, this is just throwing darts blindly.
upvoted 1 times
escalibran
7 months, 1 week ago
Given just the uncertain access patterns AND limited storage time, I would argue in favor of simple S3 Standard. If the question mentioned that the pattern of access varies across objects, but is relatively consistent for the individual objects, intelligent tiering may be worth it. Otherwise you just pay more to have objects monitored for Infrequent Access, and then suddenly become popular after being moved.
upvoted 2 times
...
...
MrPCarrot
8 months ago
A is the perfect answer - The S3 access pattern for the data is variable and changes rapidly.
upvoted 1 times
...
bujuman
8 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: A
With regard to "The S3 access pattern for the data is variable and changes rapidly" Even though Answer B cooudl fifull some requirements, Answer A is For long-lived data that have unpredictable access patterns.
upvoted 1 times
...
theochan
9 months ago
Selected Answer: B
"immediately available" => D is not immediately, and for cost B < A/C
upvoted 3 times
...
VladanO
11 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: B https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/instant-retrieval/ "Amazon S3 Glacier Instant Retrieval is an archive storage class that delivers the lowest-cost storage for long-lived data that is rarely accessed and requires retrieval in milliseconds"
upvoted 3 times
...
ivan_riqueros12
12 months ago
Selected Answer: A
A. El patrón de acceso a los datos es variable y cambia rápidamente = S3 Intelligent-Tiering
upvoted 1 times
...
Abdou1604
1 year ago
very important note , S3 Intelligent-Tiering got no retrival charges
upvoted 3 times
...
TariqKipkemei
1 year ago
Selected Answer: A
access pattern for the data is variable and changes rapidly = S3 Intelligent-Tiering
upvoted 3 times
...
Sultanoid
1 year, 1 month ago
Selected Answer: C
There are 2 viable options A and C. The Intelligent tearing(A) might put your data in the archive or Infrequent Acces if it is not used for 80 days and then used as crazy for the last 10 days of the period which will cause delays in retrieval or the costs associated with traffic. Option C can be optimised with the Time To Live policy of 90 days and will e the most efficient and reliable solution to satisfy the needs.
upvoted 4 times
pentium75
9 months, 3 weeks ago
Lifecycle policies apply to all tiers, you can have data deleted or archived after 3 months regardless whether it is in Standard or Intelligent-Tiering.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
mtmayer
1 year, 2 months ago
Has to be C. S3 Intelligent-Tiering is for data with varying or unknown access needs. Not the case here. We know data must be highly available for 30 days.
upvoted 2 times
pentium75
9 months, 3 weeks ago
Isn't "varying or unknown access needs" the same as "the access pattern is variable and changes rapidly"?
upvoted 2 times
...
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...