exam questions

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 exam

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 topic 1 question 66 discussion

A company has an application that generates a large number of files, each approximately 5 MB in size. The files are stored in Amazon S3. Company policy requires the files to be stored for 4 years before they can be deleted. Immediate accessibility is always required as the files contain critical business data that is not easy to reproduce. The files are frequently accessed in the first 30 days of the object creation but are rarely accessed after the first 30 days.
Which storage solution is MOST cost-effective?

  • A. Create an S3 bucket lifecycle policy to move files from S3 Standard to S3 Glacier 30 days from object creation. Delete the files 4 years after object creation.
  • B. Create an S3 bucket lifecycle policy to move files from S3 Standard to S3 One Zone-Infrequent Access (S3 One Zone-IA) 30 days from object creation. Delete the files 4 years after object creation.
  • C. Create an S3 bucket lifecycle policy to move files from S3 Standard to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) 30 days from object creation. Delete the files 4 years after object creation.
  • D. Create an S3 bucket lifecycle policy to move files from S3 Standard to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) 30 days from object creation. Move the files to S3 Glacier 4 years after object creation.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?). It is better to Upvote an existing comment if you don't have anything to add.
Switch to a voting comment New
Six_Fingered_Jose
Highly Voted 2 years, 2 months ago
Selected Answer: C
i think C should be the answer here, > Immediate accessibility is always required as the files contain critical business data that is not easy to reproduce If they do not explicitly mention that they are using Glacier Instant Retrieval, we should assume that Glacier -> takes more time to retrieve and may not meet the requirements
upvoted 90 times
JayBee65
2 years ago
You can make that assumption, but I think it would be wrong to make it. It does not state they are not using Glacier Instant Retrieval, and it's use would be the logical choice in this question, so I'm going for A
upvoted 7 times
syh_rapha
2 years ago
I think his assumption is correct because if you go to AWS documentation (https://aws.amazon.com/s3/storage-classes/glacier/) they clearly mention: "S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval (formerly S3 Glacier)". So since this question doesn't specify the S3 Glacier class, then it would default to flexible retrieval (which ofc is not equal to Instant Retrieval).
upvoted 11 times
slackbot
1 year, 4 months ago
why everybody assumed files must be deleted after 4 years. they said files "can" be deleted, and not "must" be deleted. ideally store the files in glacier after 4 years
upvoted 3 times
wearrexdzw3123
1 year, 1 month ago
Because it requires the lowest cost
upvoted 3 times
...
...
...
sandordini
8 months, 3 weeks ago
"With S3 Glacier Instant Retrieval, you can save up to 68% on storage costs compared to using the S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) storage class, when your data is accessed once per quarter." Repeat: once per quarter! Plus if you keep all the data forever, even if on Glacier, it will cost more over time, than storing on a higher-cost storage for a period of time (here: 4 yrs). A does not delete.
upvoted 2 times
sandordini
8 months, 3 weeks ago
Sorry! A also deletes... My bad... Still. once a quarter.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
...
Kumaran1508
1 year, 7 months ago
Yeah, Correct answer is C Because even if you assume the glacier class as Instant Retrieval. As per the Instant Retrieval class the immediate availability is only once per quarter. But in question it is clearly mentioned that the files should be immediately available anytime.
upvoted 5 times
...
...
ninjawrz
Highly Voted 2 years, 2 months ago
Selected Answer: A
Most COST EFFECTIVE A: S3 Glacier Instant Retrieval is a new storage class that delivers the fastest access to archive storage, with the same low latency and high-throughput performance as the S3 Standard and S3 Standard-IA storage classes. You can save up to 68 percent on storage costs as compared with using the S3 Standard-IA storage class when you use the S3 Glacier Instant Retrieval storage class and pay a low price to retrieve data.
upvoted 29 times
babayomi
3 months, 1 week ago
COST EFFECTIVE IS THE DIAL WORD HERE. Answer is A
upvoted 1 times
...
PoolDead
4 months, 3 weeks ago
Glacier has high retrieval costs and long retrieval times, which does not meet the requirement for immediate accessibility.
upvoted 2 times
...
Pamban
2 years, 1 month ago
"Immediate accessibility is always required as the files contain critical business data that is not easy to reproduce" is the key sentence. answer is C.
upvoted 7 times
JayBee65
2 years ago
But S3 Glacier Instant Retrieval "is designed for rarely accessed data that still needs immediate access in performance-sensitive use cases", so it offers lower cost and instant retrieval, so A
upvoted 2 times
...
Bala75krish
1 year, 10 months ago
I agree with your key sentence..but the one zone infrequent doesn't fit for critical business and it is used for recreate..
upvoted 1 times
...
...
wearrexdzw3123
1 year, 1 month ago
Glaciers usually take some time to retrieve
upvoted 1 times
...
...
PSH123
Most Recent 3 weeks, 5 days ago
Selected Answer: B
onezone IA is cheap more than standard IA
upvoted 1 times
...
0de7d1b
1 month ago
Option C is the most cost-effective solution because it provides immediate access for the first 30 days and optimizes for cost by transitioning the files to S3 Standard-IA after that period. It also complies with the company’s retention policy.
upvoted 1 times
...
PaPi_z
3 months ago
Selected Answer: C
*Immediate accessibility*
upvoted 3 times
...
anminfang
3 months, 1 week ago
It should be C. The critical point is Immediate accessibility, only S3-IA can provide this.
upvoted 2 times
...
MatAlves
4 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: C
"Immediate accessibility is always required". It can't be a, since Glacier Instant Retrieval has a limit of times the data can be accessed. "S3 Glacier Retrieval is the lowest cost archive storage with milliseconds retrieval for rarely accessed data. It is ideal for data that is accessed once or twice per quarter, and that requires immediate access."
upvoted 2 times
MatAlves
4 months, 1 week ago
If you do so more than ~4 times per year, you would pay more for Glacier Instant Retrieval than for S3 Standard.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
jatric
5 months, 3 weeks ago
Selected Answer: C
immidiately accessible for 4 years bur rarely use - S3 standard IA. Correct answer is C
upvoted 2 times
...
Duckydoo
6 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: C
Keep in mind that "Glacier Flexible Retrieval" was previously named just "Glacier" (before they added Instant Retrieval). Regardless, they should have made it clear which Glacier class they are referring to since which one you select/assume can impact the correctness.
upvoted 3 times
...
lofzee
7 months ago
Selected Answer: B
I am going to go with B. Reasoning = A = even if Glacier Instant Retrieval was used here, you can only use that quick retrieval once a quarter which isn't what the prompt is asking for. B - One Zone is the cheapest option, and the prompt does not ask for high availability. C / D - see reasoning for B
upvoted 4 times
Duckydoo
6 months, 2 weeks ago
It does mention that the data is not easily reproducible, which implies HA, so that eliminates 1Z in this case.
upvoted 4 times
...
...
Solomon2001
8 months ago
Selected Answer: B
S3 One Zone-Infrequent Access (S3 One Zone-IA) is cheaper than S3 Standard and S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) but still offers immediate accessibility. Since the files are rarely accessed after the first 30 days, transitioning them to S3 One Zone-IA after 30 days will reduce costs. The 4-year retention period aligns with the company policy, and after this period, the files can be deleted. Option C suggests moving the files from S3 Standard to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) after 30 days, which is a more expensive storage class compared to S3 One Zone-Infrequent Access (S3 One Zone-IA). Since the files are rarely accessed after the first 30 days, moving them to S3 Standard-IA would result in higher storage costs compared to moving them to S3 One Zone-IA. Therefore, option B is more cost-effective than option C.
upvoted 4 times
...
bhushansathe
9 months ago
Selected Answer: C
C is the correct answer
upvoted 2 times
...
LIORAGE
9 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: C
C: is good option because immediate accessibility is required
upvoted 1 times
...
Hadi003
9 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: B
The question ask the MOST cost-effective solution "S3 One Zone-IA stores data in a single AZ and costs 20% less than S3 Standard-IA" https://aws.amazon.com/fr/s3/storage-classes/#:~:text=S3%20One%20Zone%2DIA%20is,less%20than%20S3%20Standard%2DIA.
upvoted 6 times
lofzee
7 months ago
correct
upvoted 2 times
...
...
48cd959
9 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: C
Ans -C It should be C, As Glacier always takes some time in retrieval until they say that they are using Glacier instant access retrieval service.
upvoted 1 times
...
doransignal
9 months, 3 weeks ago
answer is c because glacier is not immediate thats why a is not the answer
upvoted 1 times
...
Ikki77
10 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: C
Option C: Create an S3 bucket lifecycle policy to move files from S3 Standard to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) 30 days from object creation. Delete the files 4 years after object creation. Options A, B, and D have drawbacks: Option A: Transitioning to S3 Glacier might introduce retrieval times and costs, which may not be suitable for files that require immediate accessibility. Deleting directly after 4 years is a more straightforward approach. Option B: S3 One Zone-Infrequent Access (S3 One Zone-IA) is less durable than Standard or Standard-Infrequent Access, as it stores data in a single availability zone. This may not be ideal for critical business data. Option D: Transitioning to S3 Glacier after 4 years introduces retrieval times and costs, which might not align with the immediate accessibility requirement. It adds complexity without a clear benefit in this scenario.
upvoted 2 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...
exam
Someone Bought Contributor Access for:
SY0-701
London, 1 minute ago