Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.
exam questions

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 All Questions

View all questions & answers for the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 exam

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 topic 1 question 24 discussion

A company observes an increase in Amazon EC2 costs in its most recent bill. The billing team notices unwanted vertical scaling of instance types for a couple of EC2 instances. A solutions architect needs to create a graph comparing the last 2 months of EC2 costs and perform an in-depth analysis to identify the root cause of the vertical scaling.
How should the solutions architect generate the information with the LEAST operational overhead?

  • A. Use AWS Budgets to create a budget report and compare EC2 costs based on instance types.
  • B. Use Cost Explorer's granular filtering feature to perform an in-depth analysis of EC2 costs based on instance types.
  • C. Use graphs from the AWS Billing and Cost Management dashboard to compare EC2 costs based on instance types for the last 2 months.
  • D. Use AWS Cost and Usage Reports to create a report and send it to an Amazon S3 bucket. Use Amazon QuickSight with Amazon S3 as a source to generate an interactive graph based on instance types.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?) , you can switch to a simple comment.
Switch to a voting comment New
sba21
Highly Voted 2 years, 1 month ago
Selected Answer: B
https://www.examtopics.com/discussions/amazon/view/68306-exam-aws-certified-solutions-architect-associate-saa-c02/
upvoted 37 times
...
123jhl0
Highly Voted 2 years, 1 month ago
Selected Answer: C
The requested result is a graph, so... A - can't be as the result is a report B - can't be as it is limited to 14 days visibility and the graph has to cover 2 months C - seems to provide graphs and the best option available, as... D - could provide graphs, BUT involves operational overhead, which has been requested to be minimised.
upvoted 27 times
kidomaruto
1 year ago
"The Cost Explorer Hourly and Resource level granularity allows you to access cost and usage data at hourly granularity for the past 14 days and resource level granularity." https://aws.amazon.com/fr/aws-cost-management/aws-cost-explorer/pricing/#:~:text=The%20Cost%20Explorer%20Hourly%20and,available%20for%20EC2%20instances%20only.
upvoted 2 times
...
Udoyen
1 year, 11 months ago
Cost Explorer, AWS prepares the data about your costs for the current month and the last 12 months: https://aws.amazon.com/aws-cost-management/aws-cost-explorer/
upvoted 17 times
JA2018
1 week, 5 days ago
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cost-management/latest/userguide/differences-billing-data-cost-explorer-data.html Cost Explorer supports deep-dive analysis so that you can identify savings opportunities. Cost Explorer data provides more granular dimensions (such as Availability Zone or operating system) and includes features that might show differences when compared to billing data. On the Cost Management preferences page, you can manage your preferences for Cost Explorer data, including linked account access and historical and granular data settings. For more information, see Controlling access to Cost Explorer.
upvoted 1 times
...
...
goku58
2 years, 1 month ago
12 months data visible on Cost Explorer.
upvoted 16 times
...
lofzee
1 year, 9 months ago
14 days? Fam, you ever logged into the console?
upvoted 22 times
ManikRoy
7 months, 4 weeks ago
Never be over-confident! check the below AWS link, which mentions the below. Cost Explorer allows customers to understand their spend for the past 14 days at the most granular hourly level. You can monitor your hourly cost and usage to determine appropriate SP/RI commitment or understand peak hour usage. https://aws.amazon.com/aws-cost-management/aws-cost-explorer/features/#:~:text=Cost%20Explorer%20allows%20customers%20to,or%20understand%20peak%20hour%20usage.
upvoted 5 times
lofzee
6 months ago
The answer is B because least operational overhead
upvoted 1 times
...
Mr_Marcus
6 months, 1 week ago
Neither the requirement nor answer B state the need for the "most granular hourly level." Correct answer is B.
upvoted 2 times
...
...
...
...
mzeynalli
Most Recent 4 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
B. Use Cost Explorer's granular filtering feature to perform an in-depth analysis of EC2 costs based on instance types. Explanation: Cost Explorer provides an easy way to analyze AWS costs and usage visually. It allows you to filter data by multiple parameters, such as instance types, regions, and time periods. It also enables you to drill down and identify specific cost drivers, such as unwanted vertical scaling. This option is suitable because it provides granular insights with minimal operational overhead, as it is a built-in AWS tool specifically designed for cost analysis.
upvoted 2 times
...
mzeynalli
4 weeks ago
The correct answer is: B. Use Cost Explorer's granular filtering feature to perform an in-depth analysis of EC2 costs based on instance types. Explanation: Cost Explorer provides an easy way to analyze AWS costs and usage visually. It allows you to filter data by multiple parameters, such as instance types, regions, and time periods. It also enables you to drill down and identify specific cost drivers, such as unwanted vertical scaling. This option is suitable because it provides granular insights with minimal operational overhead, as it is a built-in AWS tool specifically designed for cost analysis. Why Other Options Are Less Suitable: C. AWS Billing and Cost Management Dashboard: It provides a high-level view of costs, but it lacks the specific filtering capabilities needed for a granular, instance-type-level analysis over time.
upvoted 2 times
...
PaulEkwem
1 month, 1 week ago
Option B: Use AWS Cost Explorer, a tool that makes it easy to view your costs and break them down into categories like EC2 instance types, time periods, and more. With Cost Explorer, you can easily filter the information to see which EC2 instance types caused the increase in costs over the last two months. This lets you do an in-depth analysis without much effort.
upvoted 2 times
...
PaulGa
3 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: B
I would have gone for Ans B but apparently the right one is Ans C. I’m not convinced because neither B or C actually determine the root cause – they just point you in the right direction and then you’ll need to do some further analysis around resource demand (CPU, storage, network, etc), data/network traffic, what function/ instructions are actually being processed, along with taking a view of the scaling algorithms. On that basis I’d have said Ans B because it requires the LEAST overhead to get to the next step which is the one that matters: the root analysis for vertical scaling.
upvoted 3 times
...
DavidNgTan
4 months ago
Selected Answer: B
AWS Cost explorer will provide your usage and cost by main graph. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cost-management/latest/userguide/ce-what-is.html
upvoted 2 times
...
stlwell
6 months ago
Selected Answer: C
I think the highest priority is "with the LEAST operational overhead?". B is very good for "perform an in-depth analysis" but C overwhelming win on cost.
upvoted 2 times
...
firsttimetesttaker
7 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: D
Both B and D has their merits and achieve the ask of a question. Infact Option D would give more streamlined and automated approach and will be very less overhead once setup.
upvoted 1 times
...
JohnZh
7 months, 3 weeks ago
Not sure why it's B -- how can cost explorer identify the root cause of the vertical scaling?
upvoted 1 times
JohnZh
7 months, 3 weeks ago
Oh I see why: they want to identify "unwanted vertical scaling of instance types for a couple of EC2 instances", which could be RDS, ES, ElasticCache, and etc: https://aws.amazon.com/aws-cost-management/aws-cost-explorer/features/#:~:text=Cost%20Explorer%20allows%20customers%20to,or%20understand%20peak%20hour%20usage
upvoted 2 times
...
...
ManikRoy
7 months, 4 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
Note that If Hourly granularity is required then the correct option might not be B as cost explorer hourly granular details are provided only for past 14 days. reference link - https://aws.amazon.com/aws-cost-management/aws-cost-explorer/features/#:~:text=Cost%20Explorer%20allows%20customers%20to,or%20understand%20peak%20hour%20usage.
upvoted 2 times
...
vi24
8 months, 2 weeks ago
Cost and usage report is the right tool for analyzing and understanding your bill. Cost explorer is mostly used for monitoring usage/expenditure over time to forecast and decide on more suitable plan/ package.
upvoted 1 times
...
cheroh_tots
9 months, 1 week ago
The answer is B. You can enable Cost Explorer for your account using this procedure on the Billing and Cost Management console. You can't enable Cost Explorer using the API. After you enable Cost Explorer, AWS prepares the data about your costs for the current month and the last 12 months, and then calculates the forecast for the next 12 months. The current month's data is available for viewing in about 24 hours. The rest of your data takes a few days longer. Cost Explorer updates your cost data at least once every 24 hours.
upvoted 1 times
...
Ikki77
9 months, 2 weeks ago
Selected Answer: B
Cost Explorer
upvoted 1 times
...
andyngkh86
10 months, 1 week ago
The option that provides the least operational overhead for generating a graph comparing the last 2 months of EC2 costs based on instance types is: D. Use AWS Cost and Usage Reports to create a report and send it to an Amazon S3 bucket. Use Amazon QuickSight with Amazon S3 as a source to generate an interactive graph based on instance types. This option leverages the AWS Cost and Usage Reports to export detailed billing information to an Amazon S3 bucket. Then, using Amazon QuickSight, you can easily create interactive graphs and perform in-depth analysis based on instance types. This approach provides flexibility and customization in analyzing the cost data with minimal operational overhead.
upvoted 1 times
ManikRoy
7 months, 4 weeks ago
While this option will give the most detailed visibility of the cost, its certainly not one with the least operational overhead.
upvoted 2 times
...
...
awsgeek75
10 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: B
B is least operational overhead A: Can't do that C: Not granular enough D: Too much operational overhead
upvoted 4 times
...
A_jaa
10 months, 1 week ago
Selected Answer: B
Answer-B
upvoted 1 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...