Let's analyse this: B. On a Snowball Edge device you can copy files with a speed of up to 100Gbps. 70TB will take around 5600 seconds, so very quickly, less than 2 hours. The downside is that it'll take between 4-6 working days to receive the device and then another 2-3 working days to send it back and for AWS to move the data onto S3 once it reaches them. Total time: 6-9 working days. Bandwidth used: 0. C. File Gateway uses the Internet, so maximum speed will be at most 1Gbps, so it'll take a minimum of 6.5 days and you use 70TB of Internet bandwidth. D. You can achieve speeds of up to 10Gbps with Direct Connect. Total time 15.5 hours and you will use 70TB of bandwidth. However, what's interesting is that the question does not specific what type of bandwidth? Direct Connect does not use your Internet bandwidth, as you will have a dedicate peer to peer connectivity between your on-prem and the AWS Cloud, so technically, you're not using your "public" bandwidth. The requirements are a bit too vague but I think that B is the most appropriate answer, although D might also be correct if the bandwidth usage refers strictly to your public connectivity.

As using the least possible network bandwidth.

No comment

B for sure

Through Snowball edge, large amount of data can be transferred to AWS faster and securely.

B is the only solution which satisfies the bandwidth requirement.

B seems to be the correct answer

B: Create an AWS Snowball Edge job. Receive a Snowball Edge device on premises. Use the Snowball Edge client to transfer data to the device. Return the device so that AWS can import the data into Amazon S3.** This solution will meet the requirements because it allows for the rapid transfer of large amounts of data without consuming significant network bandwidth. AWS Snowball Edge is designed for such large-scale data migrations, offering high transfer speeds by physically transporting the data storage device to AWS, where the data is then uploaded to Amazon S3.

A would be way too long + bandwidth usage C would use bandwidth D would take several weeks For me, B is the lesser evil

1. point to use least possible network bandwidth where snowball is a physical device so no use of internet. 2. The data is in TB not GB, so better to use snowball

Definitely B C uses 70tb bandwidth... The thing says least amount of bandwidth. Direct connect takes weeks to even request and then configure. A isn't even an option

when dealing with TB it's better to use snowfamily devices

Option B as the question mentions least possible network bandwidth though receiving the snowball device and sending the data will take some time. Option D will be fastest but 70Tb bandwidth will be used.

keyword:no longer growing

KWs: As soon as possible, Using least possible bandwidth. 70TB is quite a bit so bandwidth is a priiority. Off the bat, I would go with a Snowball device mainly due to the sheer size of data. So snowball edge takes this. DX is good with speeds upto 100Mbps, but loses on both time to setup and bandwidth. S3 options lose on bandwidth but are immediate to setup.

you have to use snowball in this case because you have as requirement to migrate fast and 70TB of data, so definitely B.

Here are the key hints to go for option B. 1. The company wants to migrate the data as early as possible 2. Don't want to use the network bandwidth 3. Side of the data is 70 TB. AWS suggest to use Snowball Edge Device if the data is more than 10TB.