Welcome to ExamTopics
ExamTopics Logo
- Expert Verified, Online, Free.
exam questions

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional All Questions

View all questions & answers for the AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional exam

Exam AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional topic 1 question 802 discussion

A company's site reliability engineer is performing a review of Amazon FSx for Windows File Server deployments within an account that the company acquired.
Company policy states that all Amazon FSx file systems must be configured to be highly available across Availability Zones.
During the review, the site reliability engineer discovers that one of the Amazon FSx file systems used a deployment type of Single-AZ 2. A solutions architect needs to minimize downtime while aligning this Amazon FSx file system with company policy.
What should the solutions architect do to meet these requirements?

  • A. Reconfigure the deployment type to Multi-AZ for this Amazon FSx file system.
  • B. Create a new Amazon FSx file system with a deployment type of Multi-AZ. Use AWS DataSync to transfer data to the new Amazon FSx file system. Point users to the new location.
  • C. Create a second Amazon FSx file system with a deployment type of Single-AZ 2. Use AWS DataSync to keep the data in sync. Switch users to the second Amazon FSx file system in the event of failure.
  • D. Use the AWS Management Console to take a backup of the Amazon FSx file system. Create a new Amazon FSx file system with a deployment type of Multi- AZ. Restore the backup to the new Amazon FSx file system. Point users to the new location.
Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B 🗳️

Comments

Chosen Answer:
This is a voting comment (?) , you can switch to a simple comment.
Switch to a voting comment New
Bigbearcn
Highly Voted 2 years, 8 months ago
It's B. B has less downtime than D.
upvoted 8 times
...
ggrodskiy
Most Recent 1 year, 2 months ago
Correct D. Data sync is not needed when the Amazon FSx file system is set up as Multi-AZ, because data is replicated synchronously within each individual AZ and between the two AZs.
upvoted 1 times
vn_thanhtung
1 year, 1 month ago
Should be B
upvoted 1 times
...
...
orik
1 year, 11 months ago
why no A? isn't is possible to change the type?
upvoted 1 times
...
Rocketeer
2 years, 1 month ago
D Data sync not needed when setup as MultiAZ. Hence need to do a one time copy.
upvoted 1 times
...
nexus2020
2 years, 2 months ago
Selected Answer: B
B – Sync = up to date D – back and restore = not up to date = more down time
upvoted 1 times
...
cen007
2 years, 2 months ago
Selected Answer: B
B. We recommend using AWS DataSync to transfer data between FSx for Windows File Server file systems. DataSync is a data transfer service that simplifies, automates, and accelerates moving and replicating data between on-premises storage systems and other AWS storage services over the internet or AWS Direct Connect. DataSync can transfer your file system data and metadata, such as ownership, timestamps, and access permissions.
upvoted 2 times
...
asfsdfsdf
2 years, 2 months ago
Selected Answer: B
Only B and D are valid - according to AWS documentation the correct way is to use DataSync to sync the two FSx once done - switch to the new one. So B is the most correct one
upvoted 1 times
...
bobsmith2000
2 years, 4 months ago
Selected Answer: B
Obviously it's between B and D. D implies risk of loosing data which was uploaded or changed since the snapshot was taken. So I'm going with B.
upvoted 2 times
...
itznotme
2 years, 7 months ago
Selected Answer: B
https://aws.amazon.com/fsx/windows/faqs/?nc=sn&loc=8
upvoted 3 times
...
Sonujunko
2 years, 7 months ago
Selected Answer: D
D In addition to AMKazi's comment subsequent AZ failure is transparent to users, which reduces the downtime which was one the criteria in the question.
upvoted 2 times
...
cannottellname
2 years, 7 months ago
BBBB https://docs.aws.amazon.com/fsx/latest/WindowsGuide/migrate-files-to-fsx-datasync.html
upvoted 2 times
...
AMKazi
2 years, 8 months ago
And D: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/fsx/latest/WindowsGuide/using-backups.html#aws-backup-and-fsx
upvoted 2 times
...
pititcu667
2 years, 8 months ago
Selected Answer: D
D and B are good options but D has less cost.
upvoted 2 times
...
cannottellname
2 years, 8 months ago
Selected Answer: B
B. It allows data sync https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/storage/how-to-replicate-amazon-fsx-file-server-data-across-aws-regions/
upvoted 4 times
AMKazi
2 years, 8 months ago
its not about multi region data sync, its multi AZ. Ans is D https://docs.aws.amazon.com/fsx/latest/WindowsGuide/using-backups.html#aws-backup-and-fsx
upvoted 3 times
...
...
tkanmani76
2 years, 9 months ago
B should be right answer - refer FAQ for usage of Data Sync. If you’d like to migrate your existing files to Amazon FSx for Windows File Server file systems, we recommend the use of AWS DataSync, an online data transfer service designed to simplify, automate, and accelerate copying large amounts of data to and from AWS storage services.
upvoted 4 times
...
cldy
2 years, 9 months ago
B: DataSync for FSx to FSx transfer.
upvoted 2 times
...
Community vote distribution
A (35%)
C (25%)
B (20%)
Other
Most Voted
A voting comment increases the vote count for the chosen answer by one.

Upvoting a comment with a selected answer will also increase the vote count towards that answer by one. So if you see a comment that you already agree with, you can upvote it instead of posting a new comment.

SaveCancel
Loading ...