Exam AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty topic 1 question 25 discussion

C is the correct answer because gaussian naive Bayes can do this nicely.

Answer should be A:. B: LINEAR SVM is a linear classifier -> All of these have a linear decision boundary (so it's just a line y = mx+b). This leads to a bad recall and so A must be the right choice.

A non-linear problem would be a case where linear classifiers, such as naive Bayes, would not be suitable since the classes are not linearly separable. In such a scenario, non-linear classifiers (e.g.,instance-based nearest neighbour classifiers) should be preferred.

decision tree can effectively maximize the recall by drawing a square (3 <= month <= 7, 3 <= age <= 7)

Option C. Naive Bayesian classifier is not the best choice for achieving the highest recall for the fraudulent class because it makes strong assumptions about the independence of features. In many real-world scenarios, especially with complex data like user behavior, these assumptions do not hold true, which can lead to suboptimal performance. In contrast, a Decision tree (Option A) can handle feature interactions and is more flexible in capturing the relationships between features, making it more effective in identifying fraudulent behavior and achieving higher recall

Answer in my opinion is A A Decision Tree Classifier can handle complex decision boundaries and does not assume any particular distribution of data. It is well-suited for cases like this where the decision boundary is non-linear, as seen with the clear separation between the normal and fraudulent transactions. A Naive Bayesian classifier, on the other hand, assumes independence among features and typically performs better when data is normally distributed, which might not be the case here given the data's clustering pattern.

From Claude 3 Haiku: A. NO, decision trees may struggle to capture the linear separability of the classes. B. NO, Linear SVM may not be able to fully exploit the class separation due to its linear decision boundary. C. YES, The Naive Bayesian classifier tends to perform well in situations where the classes are linearly separable. This model requires the features are independent and this is the case D. The single Perceptron with a sigmoidal activation function may not be able to capture the complex class distributions as effectively as the Naive Bayesian classifier.

Answer by Claude3: In contrast, the Decision Tree (A) and Linear SVM (B) models are generally more robust to overfitting and can achieve a better balance between recall and precision, but they may not necessarily have the highest recall for the minority class. Considering the importance of maximizing recall for the fraudulent class in this use case, the Naive Bayesian Classifier (C) could be a valid choice, although it may come with the trade-off of lower precision and potentially higher false positive rates.

highest recall. So A

Only A (DT) is non-linear among the mentioned algorithms.

Given the visualized data, the Decision tree (Option A) is likely the best model to achieve the highest recall for the fraudulent class. It can handle complex patterns and create rules that are more suited for clustered and potentially non-linearly separable classes. Recall is a measure of a model's ability to capture all actual positives, and a decision tree can be tuned to prioritize capturing more of the fraudulent cases at the expense of making more false-positive errors on the normal cases.

if it was highest precision: Given these considerations, the best model for precision would likely be a Support Vector Machine with a non-linear kernel, such as the RBF (Radial Basis Function) kernel. This model can tightly fit the boundary around the fraudulent class, minimizing the inclusion of normal transactions in the fraudulent prediction space, and thus potentially achieving high precision. Precision is sensitive to the false positives, and the flexibility of SVMs with non-linear kernels to create a tight and precise boundary can help to minimize these.

GPT 4 Answer is Decision Tree. Considering the goal is to achieve the highest recall for the fraudulent class, which means we aim to capture as many fraudulent cases as possible even if it means getting more false positives, a Decision Tree would likely be the best option. This is because it can adapt to the complex shape of the class distribution and encapsulate the majority of the fraudulent class within its decision boundaries. Recall is a measure of a model's ability to capture all actual positives, and the decision tree's complex boundary setting capabilities make it well-suited for maximizing recall in this case.

I'm going with A. As pointed out in this article, Naive Bayes performs poorly with non-linear classification problems. The picture shows a case where the classes are not linearly separable. Decision Tree will probably give better results. https://sebastianraschka.com/Articles/2014_naive_bayes_1.html

Highest recall for fraudulent class means that Precision for Fraudulent predictions can be low. So basically just two conditions Transaction Month nearly greater than 8 and age of accounts greater than 8 can help identify the fraudulent class but it will classify most of non-fraudulent cases as fraudulent.

hERE iTS tHE rECALL. iF iTS fOR pRECISION, i wOULD hAVE gONE wITH sVM. sO tHE cORRECT aNSWER IS c, nAVIE bAYES.

A. NO - Decision tree would create boundaries perpendicular to the axes; not great for an oval B. NO - No linear separation here, unless we increase the space dimensation C. YES - Naive Bayesian classifier create clean boundaries (https://martin-thoma.com/comparing-classifiers/) D. NO - It would need many hidden layers (https://medium.com/@amanatulla1606/unraveling-the-magic-how-multilayer-perceptron-captures-non-linearity-in-data-6a4d385f7592)